Cited by 18Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

Effects of Test-Driven Development: A Comparative Analysis of Empirical Studies

Open access
Mäkinen, Simo, Münch, Jürgen·2014·Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-03602-1_10

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mäkinen, S., & Münch, J.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Published
2014
Pages
155-169
ISSN
  • 1865-1348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-1356
OpenAlex
W2146602212
Cited by
18
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in business information processing (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
test-driven development, software quality, defect reduction, maintainability, software complexity, development time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review