Cited by 46Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

The Impact of Test-Driven Development on Software Development Productivity — An Empirical Study

Madeyski, Lech, Szała, Łukasz·2007·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-75381-0_18

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madeyski, L., & Szała, Ł.
Affiliations
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2007-09-12
Pages
200-211
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1481560017
Cited by
46
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
test-driven development, software productivity, Goal Question Metric, software development process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review