CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyAncient Near East History

Exodus Dates and Theories

Geraty, Lawrence T.·2015·Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04768-3_4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-04768-3_4

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies have completely omitted any discussion, comparison, and analysis of various ancient temple dedication and construction texts including elapsed years when examining chronological data connected to the particular temple dedication text about Solomon and Jerusalem.

    “While this is a crucial angle of inquiry, most have completely omitted any discussion, comparison, and analysis of various ancient temple dedication and construction texts including elapsed years when examining chronological data connected to the particular temple dedication text about Solomon and Jerusalem”

    From Temple Dedication and Construction Texts of the Ancient Near East with Elapsed Years: Implications for Long Duration Chronologies (2024) · cites this paper as Geraty 2015, pp. 56-58

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Albright, William F. 1968. Yahweh and the Gods of Canaan. New York, NY: Doubleday.
  2. Aling, Charles F. 1981. Egypt and Bible History. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
  3. Anati, Emmanuel. 1985. Has Mt. Sinai Been Found? Biblical Archaeology Review 11(4, July/August): 42–57.
  4. ———. 1997. Esodo tra mito e storia. Valcamonica: Edizioni del Centro.
  5. ———. 2001. The Riddle of Mount Sinai: Archaeological Discoveries at Har Karkom, Studi Camuno, vol. 21. Valcamonica, Italy: Edizioni del Centro.
  6. ———. 2013. Is Har Karkom the Biblical Mount Sinai? Capo di Ponte, Italy: Atelier Monographs.
  7. Bennett, John G. 1963. Geophysics and Human History. Systematics 1: 127–156.
  8. Bietak, Manfred. 2003. Israelites Found In Egypt, Four-Room House Identified in Medinet Habu. Biblical Archaeology Review 29(Sept/Oct): 40–47, 49, 82–83.
  9. ———. 2010a. From Where Came the Hyksos and Where Did They Go? In The Second Intermediate Period (Thirteenth-Seventeenth Dynasties), Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta, vol. 192, ed. Marcel Marée, 139–182. Leuven: Peeters.
  10. ———. 2010b. Houses, Palaces And Development Of Social Structure in Avaris. In Cities And Urbanism In Ancient Egypt [Papers from a Workshop in November 2006 at the Austrian Academy of Sciences], eds. Manfred Bietak, et al. Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Denkschriften Der Gesamtakademie, vol. 60, 11–68. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
  11. Cohen, Rudolph. 1983. The Mysterious MB I People: Does the Exodus Tradition in the Bible Preserve the Memory of Their Entry into Canaan? Biblical Archaeology Review 9(4, July/August): 16–29.
  12. ———. 1992. The Nomadic or Semi-Nomadic Middle Bronze Age I Settlements in the Central Negev. In Pastoralism in the Levant, ed. O. Bar-Yosef and A. Khazanov, 105–131. Madison, WI: Prehistroy Press.
  13. ———, ed. 1999. Ancient Settlement of the Central Negev. Vol. 1: The Chalcolithic Period, the Early Bronze Age and the Middle Bronze Age I. Israel Antiquities Authority Reports, no. 6, Jerusalem: IAA [Hebrew with Eng. summary].
  14. Galanopoulos, Angelos G. 1964. Die Agyptischen Plagen und der Auszug Israels aus geologischer Sieht. Das Altertum 10(3): 131–137.
  15. Goedicke, Hans. 1981. Goedicke Defends His Exodus Thesis, letter. In BAR, vol. 8(2, March/April), 12a–b.
  16. Gottwald, Norman K. 1979. The Tribes of Yahweh. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
  17. Horn, S.H. 1977. What We Don’t Know About Moses and the Exodus. Biblical Archaeology Review 3(2, Jun): 22–31.
  18. Humphreys, Colin J. 2004. The Miracles of Exodus. New York, NY: Harper.
  19. Kitchen, Kenneth A. 1977. The Bible in its World. Nottingham: InterVarsity.
  20. Sellin, Ernst, and Carl Watzinger. 1913. Jericho. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.
  21. Shea, William H. 1982. Exodus, Date of. In International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. Rev. ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, vol. 2, 230–238. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
  22. Ussher, James. 1650. Annales Veteris et Novi Testamenti. Vol. 1. London [Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1979 microfilm] [Latin].
  23. ——— (ed.). 1965. The Bible and the Ancient Near East. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Geraty, L. T.
Affiliations
La Sierra University (US)
Corresponding author
Geraty, Lawrence T.
Venue
Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2015
Pages
55-64
ISSN
  • 2199-0956 (ISSN-L)
  • 2199-0964
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-04768-3_4
OpenAlex
W2246898040
Cited by
5
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quantitative methods in the humanities and social sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
Exodus, Hebrew Bible, Eighteenth Dynasty, 19th Dynasty, Pharaoh, ancient Egypt, chronology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review