The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Landmarks: GIScience for Intelligent Services
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Robust biological systems consolidate spatial knowledge into three interconnected forms: landmarks for salient cues, route knowledge for movement trajectories, and survey knowledge for map-like representations.”
From Brain-inspired spatial intelligence for embodied agents (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“Despite their acknowledged contribution to various components of spatial navigation and human cognition (see reviews by Chan et al., 2012; Epstein & Vass, 2014; Epstein et al., 2017; Yesiltepe et al., 2021), landmarks are not communicated effectively on mobile navigation systems to support wayfinders’ spatial learning (Richter & Winter, 2014).”
From The influence of landmark visualization style on task performance, visual attention, and spatial learning in a real-world navigation task (2024) · cites this paper as Richter & Winter, 2014
In the citing paper
“So, whilst the benefit of landmark information for efficient navigation is clear, the means by which to effectively communicate that information on mobile navigation systems have yet to be established (Richter & Winter, 2014).”
From The influence of landmark visualization style on task performance, visual attention, and spatial learning in a real-world navigation task (2024) · cites this paper as Richter & Winter, 2014
In the citing paper
“This finding aligns with previous work in that visually salient landmarks do attract and modulate viewers’ bottom-up or stimulus-driven visual attention, but clearly in different ways for individuals with different backgrounds, training, abilities, etc (Richter & Winter, 2014; Wenczel et al., 2017; Wolfe & Horowitz, 2017; Yesiltepe et al., 2021).”
From The influence of landmark visualization style on task performance, visual attention, and spatial learning in a real-world navigation task (2024) · cites this paper as Richter & Winter, 2014
Citations
Cites
Computing Machinery and Intelligence
Turing, A. M. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_3 · Cited by 1,439
Enriching Wayfinding Instructions with Local Landmarks
Raubal, M., & Winter, S. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17 · Cited by 515
Self-citationThe Nature of Landmarks for Real and Electronic Spaces
Sorrows, M. E., & Hirtle, S. C. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48384-5_3 · Cited by 478
Points of reference in spatial cognition: Stalking the elusive landmark*
Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1988) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1988.tb01113.x · Cited by 239
Including landmarks in routing instructions
Duckham, M., Winter, S., & Robinson, M. (2010) · Journal of Location Based Services · doi:10.1080/17489721003785602 · Cited by 184
Self-citationIntelligent Spatial Communication
Winter, S., & Wu, Y. (2009) · Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88244-2_16 · Cited by 10
Self-citationConceptual Aspects: How Landmarks Can Be Described in Data Models
Richter, K., & Winter, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05732-3_4 · Cited by 2
Self-citationCommunication Aspects: How Landmarks Enrich the Communication Between Human and Machine
Richter, K., & Winter, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05732-3_6 · Cited by 2
Self-citationConclusions: What Is Known and What Is Still Challenging About Landmarks
Richter, K., & Winter, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05732-3_7 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Landmarks in wayfinding: a review of the existing literature
Yeşiltepe, D., Dalton, R., & Torun, A. Ö. (2021) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-021-01012-x · Cited by 118
How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
Brügger, A., Richter, K., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2019) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-019-0156-5 · Cited by 102
Self-citationSimilarity matching for integrating spatial information extracted from place descriptions
Kim, J., Vasardani, M., & Winter, S. (2016) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1188930 · Cited by 75
Self-citationVirtual environments as memory training devices in navigational tasks for older adults
Lokka, I. E., Çöltekin, A., Wiener, J. M., Fabrikant, S. I., & Röcke, C. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29029-x · Cited by 65
Lokka, I. E., & Çöltekin, A. (2017) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2017.1349842 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Richter, K.-F., & Winter, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2014
- OpenAlex
- W4205511608
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
- Keywords
- landmarks, geographic information science, landmark selection, cognitive systems, human-computer interaction, navigation services, cognitive modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
