Cited by 133Spatial Cognition and NavigationGeographic Information Systems StudiesUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Landmarks: GIScience for Intelligent Services

Richter, Kai-Florian, Winter, Stephan·2014·Springer eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-05732-3

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Richter, K.-F., & Winter, S.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2014
OpenAlex
W4205511608
Cited by
133
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.58
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
landmarks, geographic information science, landmark selection, cognitive systems, human-computer interaction, navigation services, cognitive modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review