Cited by 13Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsEmotion and Mood Recognition

Effects of Language Variety on Personality Perception in Embodied Conversational Agents

Krenn, Brigitte, Endrass, Birgit, Kistler, Felix, André, Elisabeth·2014·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-07230-2_41

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krenn, B., Endrass, B., Kistler, F., & André, E.
Affiliations
  • Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AT)
  • University of Augsburg (DE)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2014
Pages
429-439
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2273617670
Cited by
13
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
embodied conversational agents, personality perception, language varieties, synthetic speech, extraversion-introversion, standard German, virtual characters, speech synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review