The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Personal and Organizational Excellence through Servant Leadership: Learning to Serve, Serving to Lead, Leading to Transform
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“All in all, conceptually speaking, servant leaders have a greater likelihood than transformational leaders to set the following priorities in their leadership focus: followers first, organizations second, their own last (Sendjaya, 2015).”
From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Sendjaya, 2015
In the citing paper
“the physical and emotional demands on servant leaders is high due to their time spent with, and the emotional energy exhorted on employees (Sendjaya, 2015)”
From Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019) · cites this paper as Sendjaya, 2015
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004 · Cited by 1,858
“Drawing on this model, as servant leadership has a greater focus on followers than other leadership approaches (van Dierendonck, 2011), the physical and emotional demands on servant leaders is high due to their time spent with, and the emotional energy exhorted on employees (Sendjaya, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationThe Functions of a Servant Leader
Coetzer, M. F., Bussin, M. H. R., & Geldenhuys, M. (2017) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci7010005 · Cited by 305
Neubert, M. J., Hunter, E. M., & Tolentino, R. C. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005 · Cited by 214
Lu, J., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3816-3 · Cited by 190
SLBS-6: Validation of a Short Form of the Servant Leadership Behavior Scale
Sendjaya, S., Eva, N., Butar Butar, I., Robin, M., & Castles, S. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3594-3 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sendjaya, S.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sendjaya, Sen
- ORCID
- Sendjaya, Sen
- Venue
- Management for Professionals
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2192-8096 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-810X
- OpenAlex
- W4255492228
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Management for professionals (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- servant leadership, organizational excellence, personal excellence, workplace ethics, leadership framework, management practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
