Cited by 27Tactile and Sensory InteractionsAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

The Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a Finger-Mounted Camera and Feedback System to Enable Reading of Printed Text for the Blind

Open access
Stearns, Lee, Du, Ruofei, Oh, Uran, Wang, Yumeng, Findlater, Leah, Chellappa, Rama, Froehlich, Jon E.·2015·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-16199-0_43

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stearns, L., Du, R., Oh, U., Wang, Y., Findlater, L., Chellappa, R., & Froehlich, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Stearns, Lee
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2015
Pages
615-631
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2406691756
Cited by
27
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
10.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
visually impaired users, blind users, haptic feedback, audio feedback, activities of daily living, assistive technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review