Design and Usability Evaluation of Adaptive e-learning Systems Based on Learner Knowledge and Learning Style
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adaptive e-learning focused on learner experience and learning style has a higher degree of perceived usability than a non-adaptive e-learning system.
“Adaptive e-learning focused on learner experience and learning style has a higher degree of perceived usability than a non-adaptive e-learning system, according to Alshammari et al. (2015).”
From Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement (2021) · cites this paper as Alshammari et al. (2015)
Cites
SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale
(1996) · Usability Evaluation In Industry · doi:10.1201/9781498710411-35 · Cited by 8,989 · see citing works
An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale
Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447310802205776 · Cited by 5,181 · see citing works
E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification
Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.008 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Identification of personal traits in adaptive learning environment: Systematic literature review
Afini Normadhi, N. B., Shuib, L., Md Nasir, H. N., Bimba, A., Idris, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.005 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Personalisation methods in e-learning-A literature review
Mikić, V., Ilić, M., Kopanja, L., & Vesin, B. (2022) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22566 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alshammari, M., Anane, R., & Hendley, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Coventry University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Alshammari, Mohammad
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- LNCS-9297
- Issue
- Part II
- Pages
- 584-591
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1788795499
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- inria.hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
- The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Keywords
- adaptive e-learning systems, usability evaluation, student knowledge, learning styles, student satisfaction, student engagement, student motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
