Cited by 15ECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasNumerical methods in inverse problems

Robust Transmural Electrophysiological Imaging: Integrating Sparse and Dynamic Physiological Models into ECG-Based Inference

Open access
Xu, Jingjia, Sapp, John L., Dehaghani, Azar Rahimi, Gao, Fei, Horacek, Milan, Wang, Linwei·2015·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

Noninvasive inference of patient-specific intramural electrical activity from surface electrocardiograms (ECG) lacks a unique solution in the absence of prior assumptions. While 3D cardiac electrophysiological models emerged to be a viable vehicle for constraining this inference with knowledge about the spatiotemporal dynamics of cardiac excitation, it is important for the inference to be robust to errors in these high-dimensional model predictions given the limited ECG data. We present an innovative solution to this problem by exploiting the low-dimensional structure of the solution space – a powerful regularizer in overcoming the lack of measurements – within the dynamic inference guided by physiological models. We present the first Bayesian inference framework that allows the exploration of both the spatial sparsity of cardiac excitation and its complex nonlinear spatiotemporal dynamics for an improved inference of patient-specific intramural electrical activity. The benefit of this integration is verified in both synthetic and real-data experiments, where we present one of the first detailed, point-by-point comparison of the reconstructed electrical activity to in-vivo catheter mapping data. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_62

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incorporating theory-guided spatial distributions as priors along with externally collected ECG data in a hierarchical Bayesian model provides promising results over traditional data science models.

    “Incorporating such theory-guided spatial distributions as priors and using it along with externally collected ECG data in a hierarchical Bayesian model has been shown to provide promising results over traditional data science models [26], [27].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Julier, S.: The scaled unscented transform. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 47, 1445-1462 (2000)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, J., Sapp, J. L., Dehaghani, A. R., Gao, F., Horacek, M., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Xu, Jingjia
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2015
Pages
519-527
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2398062891
Cited by
15
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CAREER, 1350374)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
Keywords
electrocardiogram, Bayesian inference, patient-specific cardiac modeling, catheter mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review