Cited by 37Mobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

An Integrated Reward and Reputation Mechanism for MCS Preserving Users’ Privacy

Tanas, Cristian, Delgado-Segura, Sergi, Herrera-Joancomartí, Jordi·2016·Lecture notes in computer science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-29883-2_6

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanas, C., Delgado-Segura, S., & Herrera-Joancomartí, J.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Lecture notes in computer science
Published
2016
Pages
83-99
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2464343799
Cited by
37
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
mobile crowdsensing, user privacy, reputation systems, cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, user participation, user anonymity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review