Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nature-Based Solutions and Climate Change – Four Shades of Green

Open access
Pauleit, Stephan, Zölch, Teresa, Hansen, Rieke, Randrup, Thomas B., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, Cecil·2017·Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions

Abstract

‘Nature-based ‑solutions’ (NbS) aim to use nature in tackling challenges such as climate change, food security, water resources, or disaster risk management. The concept has been adopted by the European Commission in its research programme Horizon 2020 to promote its uptake in urban areas and establish Europe as a world leader of NbS. However, the concept has been defined vaguely. Moreover, its relationships with already existing concepts and approaches to enhance nature and its benefits in urban areas require clarification. Notably, ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA), urban green infrastructure (UGI) and ecosystem services (ESS) have gained prominence in academic debates and are increasingly referred to in policy-making. In this chapter main features of each of the concepts, as well as overlaps and differences between them are analysed based on a review of key literature. NbS is the most recent and broadest of the four concepts. Therefore, it may be considered as an umbrella to the other concepts but with a distinct focus on deployment of actions on the ground. EbA is a subset of NbS that is specifically concerned with climate change adaptation via the use of nature. As a planning approach, UGI, on the other hand, can provide strategic guidance for the integration of NbS into developing multifunctional green space networks at various scales. Finally, ESS value the benefits that humans derive from urban nature. ESS can support policy making for prioritising strategies and actions to maximise the benefits of NbS and can thus be considered as a kind of connecting concept between the other concepts. Overall, it is concluded that NbS is a powerful metaphor which, however, critically depends on UGI and ESS for its further definition and systematic uptake in urban areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_3

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Balian E, Eggermont H, Le Roux X (2014) Outcomes of the strategic foresight workshop “Nature-based solutions in a BiodivERsA context”, Brussels, June 11–12, 2014. BiodivERsA Report. Available via http://www.biodiversa.org/671 . Accessed 31 Jan 2015
  2. CBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) (2009) Connecting biodiversity and climate change mitigation and adaptation: report of the second Ad Hoc technical expert group on biodiversity and climate change, Technical series no. 41. Canadian Electronic Library, Montreal
  3. Hough M (2004) Cities and natural process, 2nd edn. Routledge, London · doi:10.4324/9780203643471
  4. Howard E (1902) Garden cities of tomorrow. Swan Sonnenscheind & Co. Ltd., London
  5. IUCN (2009) No time to lose: make full use of nature-based solutions in the post-2012 climate change regime. Position paper on the fifteenth session of the conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 15). IUCN, Gland
  6. Jongman RHG (2004) The context and concept of ecological networks. In: Jongman RHG, Pungetti G (eds) Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design, implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–33 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606762.004
  7. Lehmann S (2010) The principles of green urbanism. Earthscan, London
  8. McDonald LA, Allen WL, Benedict MA, O’Conner K (2005) Green infrastructure plan evaluation frameworks. J Conser Plann 1:6–25
  9. Mostafavi M, Doherty G (2010) Ecological urbanism. Lars Müller Publ, Zurich
  10. Naumann S, Anzaldua G, Berry P, Burch S, Davis M, Frelih Larsen A, Gerdes H, Sanders M (2011a) Assessment of the potential of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation in Europe. Oxford University Centre for the Environment, Oxford
  11. Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H (2009) Resilient cities. Island Press, Washington, DC
  12. Register R (2006) Ecocities. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island
  13. Spirn AW (1984) The granite garden. Basic Books, New York
  14. Sukopp H, Wittig R (eds) (1998) Stadtökologie, 2nd edn. G Fischer, Stuttgart
  15. Thompson BH Jr (2008) Ecosystem services and natural capital: reconceiving environmental management. New York Univ Environ Law J 17:460–489
  16. Walmsley A (2006) Greenways: multiplying and diversifying in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 76:252–290 · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.036
  17. Welter V, Lawson J (eds) (2000) The city after Patrick Geddes. Lang, Bern
  18. Zandersen M, Jensen A, Termansen M, Buchholtz G, Munter B, Bruun HG, Andersen AH (2014) Ecosystem based approaches to climate adaptation – urban prospects and barriers, vol 83. Aarhus University, Aarhus

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Pauleit, S., Zölch, T., Hansen, R., Randrup, T. B., & Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C.
Venue
Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions
Published
2017
Pages
29-49
ISSN
  • 2199-5508 (ISSN-L)
  • 2199-5516
OpenAlex
W2751383204
Cited by
258
References
57
FWCI
38.07
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nature-Based Solutions and Climate Change – Four Shades of Green. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_3
The paper
Pauleit, S., Zölch, T., Hansen, R., Randrup, T. B., & Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. (2017). Nature-Based Solutions and Climate Change – Four Shades of Green. Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.