Correspondence Studies
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The correspondence testing method is still considered the reference method for measuring hiring discrimination at present.
“the correspondence testing method is still considered the reference method for measuring hiring discrimination at present (Baert, 2018;Neumark, 2018;Verhaeghe, 2022).”
From The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2023) · cites this paper as Verhaeghe, 2022
Cites
Meta-analysis of field experiments shows no change in racial discrimination in hiring over time
Quillian, L., Pager, D., Hexel, O., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1706255114 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence
Rooth, D.-O. (2010) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2009.04.005 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments
Quillian, L., & Midtbøen, A. H. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090420-035144 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Rich, J. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2517887 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Field Experiment Tests for Discrimination against Hispanics in the U.S. Rental Housing Market
Hanson, A., & Santas, M. (2014) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2012.231 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lippens, L., Vermeiren, S., & Baert, S. (2023) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104315
- Authors
- Verhaeghe, P.-P.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Verhaeghe, Pieter-Paul
- Venue
- Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 1-19
- OpenAlex
- W4210518720
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Keywords
- correspondence test, discriminatory behavior, labor market discrimination, housing discrimination, consumer discrimination, research ethics, policy evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
