Cited by 9Educational Philosophies and PedagogiesEmpathy and Medical EducationEducation, Philosophy, and Society

Pursuing the aim of compassionate empathy in higher education

Maxwell, Bruce·2017·The Pedagogy of Compassion at the Heart of Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-57783-8_3

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of compassion and other 'intellectual virtues' receive limited recognition as legitimate learning goals in the current higher education climate.

    “However, the development of compassion and other ‘intellectual virtues’ receive limited recognition as legitimate learning goals in the current higher education climate (Maxwell, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maxwell, B.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Corresponding author
Maxwell, Bruce
Venue
The Pedagogy of Compassion at the Heart of Higher Education
Published
2017
Pages
33-48
OpenAlex
W2734936421
Cited by
9
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
Keywords
higher education, professional ethics, moral education, perspective taking, compassion, emotional engagement, teaching principles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review