The Bright Side and the Dark Side of Patient Empowerment: Co-creation and Co-destruction of Value in the Healthcare Environment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient empowerment contributes to enhancing the quality of care and health outcomes.
“In addition, patient empowerment contributes to enhancing the quality of care and health outcomes [16,17].”
From Improving the Theoretical Understanding Toward Patient-Driven Health Care Innovation Through Online Value Cocreation: Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
The Bright Side of Patient Empowerment
Palumbo, R. (2017) · SpringerBriefs in public health · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58344-0_2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of Health Literacy in Empowering Patients
Palumbo, R. (2017) · SpringerBriefs in public health · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58344-0_4 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Dark Side of Patient Empowerment
Palumbo, R. (2017) · SpringerBriefs in public health · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58344-0_3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rezaei Aghdam, A., Watson, J., Cliff, C., & Miah, S. J. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16324 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Palumbo, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Salerno (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Palumbo, Rocco
- ORCID
- Palumbo, Rocco
- Venue
- SpringerBriefs in Public Health
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2192-3698 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-3701
- OpenAlex
- W4247354438
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- SpringerBriefs in public health (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- patient empowerment, patient-provider partnership, health care system, patient engagement, collaborative care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
