Cited by 4Emotion and Mood RecognitionContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Dynamic model of athletes' emotions based on wearable devices

Dupré, Damien, Bland, Ben, Bolster, Andrew, Morrison, Gawain, McKeown, Gary·2018·Advances in intelligent systems and computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-60822-8_4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dupré, D., Bland, B., Bolster, A., Morrison, G., & McKeown, G.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Dupré, Damien
Venue
Advances in intelligent systems and computing
Published
2017-06-15
Pages
42-50
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W2624732341
Cited by
4
References
20
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
athlete emotions, wearable sensors, physiological rhythms, heart rate, respiratory rate, skin conductance, emotion modeling, body area networks, physical activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review