Cited by 1,153Disaster Management and ResilienceEarthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesDisaster Response and Management

Poverty and Disasters in the United States: A Review of Recent Sociological Findings

Fothergill, Alice, Peek, Lori A.·2004·Natural Hazards

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:nhaz.0000026792.76181.d9

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. A.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Peek, Lori A.
Venue
Natural Hazards
Published
2004-05
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
89-110
ISSN
  • 0921-030X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0840
OpenAlex
W2100862548
Cited by
1,153
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 27
FWCI
44.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Natural Hazards (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
Keywords
poverty, natural disasters, disaster vulnerability, low-income populations, socioeconomic status, disaster preparedness, disaster response, disaster recovery, post-disaster reconstruction, psychological impact of disasters, social exclusion, social equity, disaster policy, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review