Cited by 45Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisPhysical Activity and Health

Learning Deep and Shallow Features for Human Activity Recognition

Open access
Sani, Sadiq, Massie, Stewart, Wiratunga, Nirmalie, Cooper, Kay·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-63558-3_40

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNN-extracted features are excellent compared to hand-crafted time and frequency domain features (FFT and DCT), as shown in [162].

    “This allows CNN to learn excellent features as shown in [162], which compares the features extracted from CNN to hand-crafted time and frequency domain features (Fast Fourier Transform and Discrete Cosine Transform).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sani, S., Massie, S., Wiratunga, N., & Cooper, K.
Affiliations
Robert Gordon University (GB)
Corresponding author
Massie, Stewart
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2017
Pages
469-482
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2737046835
Cited by
45
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
human activity recognition, wearable sensors, accelerometer, wrist-worn sensors, feature representation, convolutional neural networks, handcrafted features, frequency-domain features, low back pain, self-management, physical activity adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review