Cited by 37Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Automatic Quality Control of Cardiac MRI Segmentation in Large-Scale Population Imaging

Robinson, Robert, Valindria, Vanya V., Bai, Wenjia, Suzuki, Hideaki, Matthews, Paul M., Page, Chris, Rueckert, Daniel, Glocker, Ben·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_82

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike previous studies that explored RCA focusing on cardiac MRI or multi-organ segmentation on whole-body MRI only, this work broadens the analysis to a wider range of medical imaging challenges.

    “Unlike previous studies that explored RCA focusing on cardiac MRI [28], [29] or multi-organ segmentation on whole-body MRI [5] only, we broaden our analysis to a wider range of medical imaging challenges.”

    From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

  • A single-atlas approach offers the strongest results in the classical RCA framework.

    “We compared the performance of In-Context RCA with a singleatlas approach, known to offer the strongest results in the classical RCA framework [5], [28].”

    From ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, R., Valindria, V. V., Bai, W., Suzuki, H., Matthews, P. M., Page, C., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Robert
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2017
Pages
720-727
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2752595895
Cited by
37
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M024903/1, MC_PC_17114)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N014529/1, EP/P001009/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
cardiac MRI, image segmentation, quality control, automated quality assessment, biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review