The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revealing User Confidence in Machine Learning-Based Decision Making
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zhou et al. (2018) is the only study in the survey in which a physiological trust measurement is applied.
“Zhou et al. (2018) is the only study in our survey in which a physiological trust measurement is applied, therefore we did not include it in the strategies shown in Figure 3.”
From Trust, distrust, and appropriate reliance in (X)AI: A conceptual clarification of user trust and survey of its empirical evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as Zhou et al. (2018)
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty
Platt, M. L., & Huettel, S. A. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2062 · Cited by 556
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- Aimone, J.A., Houser, D., Weber, B.: Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: an fMRI study of trust. Proc. Biol. Sci. / Royal Soc. 281(1782), 20132127 (2014) · DOI
- Arshad, S., Wang, Y., Chen, F.: Interactive mouse stream as real-time indicator of user’s cognitive load. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1025–1030 (2015) · DOI
- Azizi, H., Ajirlu, S.F.: Measurement of overall performances of decision-making units using ideal and anti-ideal decision-making units. Comput. Ind. Eng. 59(3), 411–418 (2010) · DOI
- Beller, J., Heesen, M., Vollrath, M.: Improving the drivercautomation interaction an approach using automation uncertainty. Hum. Factors J. Human Factors Ergon. Soc. 55(6), 1130–1141 (2013) · DOI
- Camerer, C., Weber, M.: Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertain. 5(4), 325–370 (1992) · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, F., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Yu, K., Arshad, S.Z., Khawaji, A., Conway, D.: Robust Multimodal Cognitive Load Measurement, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin (2016) · DOI
- Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E.: Grounding in communication. In: Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127–149. American Psychological Association (1991) · DOI · Paper page
- Edwards, J.A., Snyder, F.J., Allen, P.M., Makinson, K.A., Hamby, D.M.: Decision making for risk management: a comparison of graphical methods for presenting quantitative uncertainty. Risk Anal. Off. Publ. Soc. Risk Anal. 32(12), 2055–2070 (2012) · DOI
- Eyster, E., Weizsacker, G.: Correlation Neglect in Financial Decision-Making. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1104 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1735339 · DOI
- Fiedler, S., Glockner, A.: The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: an eye-tracking analysis. Front. Psychol. 3 (2012) · DOI
- Figner, B., Murphy, R.O.: Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research. In: A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods for Decision Research: A critical Review and User’s Guide, pp. 163–184 (2010)
- Franco-Watkins, A.M., Johnson, J.G.: Applying the decision moving window to risky choice: Comparison of eye-tracking and mouse-tracing methods. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 6(8), 740–749 (2011) · DOI
- Gog, T.V., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., Sweller, J.: The mirror neuron system and observational learning: implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 21(1), 21–30 (2008)
- Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A.: An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1157–1182 (2003)
- Hahn, T., Notebaert, K., Anderl, C., Teckentrup, V., Kaßecker, A., Windmann, S.: How to trust a perfect stranger: predicting initial trust behavior from resting-state brain-electrical connectivity. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 10(6), 809–813 (2015) · DOI
- Heekeren, H.R., Marrett, S., Ungerleider, L.G.: The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9(6), 467–479 (2008) · DOI
- Hill, B.: Confidence and decision. Games Econ. Behav. 82(C), 675–692 (2013) · DOI
- Hsu, M.: Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 310(5754), 1680–1683 (2005) · DOI · Paper page
- Huettel, S.A., Stowe, C.J., Gordon, E.M., Warner, B.T., Platt, M.L.: Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron 49(5), 765–775 (2006) · DOI
- Ibrekk, H., Morgan, M.G.: Graphical communication of uncertain quantities to nontechnical people. Risk Anal. 7(4), 519–529 (1987) · DOI
- Jenkins, Q., Jiang, X.: Measuring trust and application of eye tracking in human robotic interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Industrial Engineering Research Conference (2010)
- Kelsey, D.: Maxmin expected utility and weight of evidence. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 46(3), 425–444 (1994) · DOI
- Khawaji, A., Chen, F., Zhou, J., Marcus, N.: Trust and cognitive load in the text-chat environment: the role of mouse movement. In: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design, OzCHI ’14, pp. 324–327 (2014) · DOI · Paper page
- Kirschenbaum, S.S., Trafton, J.G., Schunn, C.D., Trickett, S.B.: Visualizing uncertainty: the impact on performance. Hum. Factors 56(3), 509–520 (2014) · DOI
- Köbberling, V.: Strength of preference and cardinal utility. Econ. Theory 27(2), 375–391 (2006) · DOI
- Lee, M.D., Dry, M.J.: Decision making and confidence given uncertain advice. Cogn. Sci. 30(6), 1081–1095 (2006) · DOI
- Liao, H., Xu, Z., Zeng, X.J., Merigó, J.M.: Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl.-Based Syst. 76, 127–138 (2015) · DOI
- Moll, J., De Oliveira-Souza, R., Zahn, R.: The neural basis of moral cognition: sentiments, concepts, and values. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 161–180 (2008) · DOI
- Moran, R., Teodorescu, A.R., Usher, M.: Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: novel data and a computational account. Cogn. Psychol. 78, 99–147 (2015) · DOI
- Morgado, P., Sousa, N., Cerqueira, J.J.: The impact of stress in decision making in the context of uncertainty. J. Neurosci. Res. 93(6), 839–847 (2015) · DOI
- Pallier, G., Wilkinson, R., Danthiir, V., Kleitman, S., Knezevic, G., Stankov, L., Roberts, R.D.: The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments. J. Gen. Psychol. 129(3), 257–299 (2002) · DOI
- Peper, E., Harvey, R., Lin, I.M., Tylova, H., Moss, D.: Is there more to blood volume pulse than heart rate variability respiratory sinus arrhythmia, and cardiorespiratory synchrony? Biofeedback 35(2), 54–61 (2007)
- Preuschoff, K., ’t Hart, B.M., Einhäuser, W.: Pupil dilation signals surprise: evidence for noradrenaline’s role in decision making. Front. Neurosci. 5, 115 (2011) · DOI
- Ray, P.K., Sahu, S.: Productivity measurement through multi-criteria decision making. Eng. Costs Prod. Econ. 20(2), 151–163 (1990) · DOI
- Scantamburlo, T.: Machine learning in decisional process: a philosophical perspective. ACM SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45(3), 218–224 (2015) · DOI
- Smith, L.J., Anand, P., Benattayallah, A., Hodgson, T.L.: An fMRI investigation of moral cognition in healthcare decision making. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 8(2), 116–133 (2015) · DOI
- Smith, P.J., Geddes, N.D., Beatty, R.: Human-centered design of decision-support systems. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J.A. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: Design Issues, Solutions, and Applications. CRC Press (2009) · DOI
- Stickel, C., Ebner, M., Steinbach-Nordmann, S., Searle, G., Holzinger, A.: Emotion detection: application of the valence arousal space for rapid biological usability testing to enhance universal access. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Addressing Diversity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5614, pp. 615–624. Springer, Berlin (2009) · DOI
- Taghavifard, M.T., Damghani, K.K., Moghaddam, R.T.: Decision Making Under Uncertain and Risky Situations. Enterprise Risk Management Symposium Monograph Society of Actuaries, Schaumburg, Illinois, Tech. rep (2009)
- Wagstaff, K.: Machine learning that matters. In: Proceedings of ICML2012, pp. 529–536 (2012)
- Watanabe, S.: Pattern Recognition: Human and Mechanical. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, USA (1985)
- White, T.P., Engen, N.H., Sørensen, S., Overgaard, M., Shergill, S.S.: Uncertainty and confidence from the triple-network perspective: voxel-based meta-analyses. Brain Cogn. 85, 191–200 (2014) · DOI
- Ye, J.: Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 42(4), 386–394 (2013) · DOI
- Zhou, J., Arshad, S.Z., Wang, X., Li, Z., Feng, D., Chen, F.: End-user development for interactive data analytics: uncertainty, correlation and user confidence. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. (2017) · DOI
- Zhou, J., Arshad, S.Z., Yu, K., Chen, F.: Correlation for user confidence in predictive decision making. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, OzCHI’16, pp. 252–256 (2016) · DOI
- Zhou, J., Bridon, C., Chen, F., Khawaji, A., Wang, Y.: Be informed and be involved: effects of uncertainty and correlation on user’s confidence in decision making. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 923–928 (2015) · DOI
- Zhou, J., Chen, F.: Making machine learning useable. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Tech. Appl. 14(2), 91 (2015)
- Zhou, J., Jung, J.Y., Chen, F.: Dynamic workload adjustments in human-machine systems based on GSR features. In: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 550–558. Springer, Berlin (2015) · DOI
- Zhou, J., Khawaja, M.A., Li, Z., Sun, J., Wang, Y., Chen, F.: Making machine learning useable by revealing internal states update & #45; a transparent approach. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 13(4), 378–389 (2016) · DOI
- Zhou, J., Sun, J., Chen, F., Wang, Y., Taib, R., Khawaji, A., Li, Z.: Measurable decision making with GSR and pupillary analysis for intelligent user interface. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 21(6), 33:1–33:23 (2015) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Visser, R., Peters, T. M., Scharlau, I., & Hammer, B. (2025) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101357 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, J., Yu, K., & Chen, F.
- Venue
- Human–Computer Interaction Series
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 225-244
- ISSN
- 1571-5035
- 2524-4477
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review