Cited by 556Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty

Open access
Platt, Michael L, Huettel, Scott A·2008·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Many decisions involve uncertainty, or imperfect knowledge about how choices lead to outcomes. Colloquial notions of uncertainty, particularly when describing a decision as 'risky', often carry connotations of potential danger as well. Gambling on a long shot, whether a horse at the racetrack or a foreign oil company in a hedge fund, can have negative consequences, but the impact of uncertainty on decision making extends beyond gambling. Indeed, uncertainty in some form pervades nearly all our choices in daily life. Stepping into traffic to hail a cab, braving an ice storm to be the first at work, or dating the boss's son or daughter also offer potentially great windfalls, at the expense of surety. We continually face trade-offs between options that promise safety and others that offer an uncertain potential for jackpot or bust. When mechanisms for dealing with uncertain outcomes fail, as in mental disorders such as problem gambling or addiction, the results can be disastrous. Thus, understanding decision making-indeed, understanding behavior itself-requires knowing how the brain responds to and uses information about uncertainty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn2062

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Platt, M. L., & Huettel, S. A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Platt, Michael L
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2008-03-26
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
398-403
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1988706006
Cited by
556
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 34
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG030771)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH071817, MH-070685, MH-71817, R01MH070685)
  • National Eye Institute (EY-13496, R01EY013496)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS041328)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
decision making under uncertainty, neuroeconomics, risk, gambling, problem gambling, addiction, risk-taking
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Probability Learning, Reinforcement, Psychology, Risk-Taking, Sex Factors, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review