The Vive Controllers vs. Leap Motion for Interactions in Virtual Environments: A Comparative Evaluation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research results indicate that hand-tracking-based systems are not necessarily as accurate or efficient as controller-based systems for direct object manipulation in VR.
“Previous research results indicate (e.g., [9-11]) that hand-tracking-based systems are not necessarily as accurate or efficient as controller-based systems for direct object manipulation in VR.”
From Trade-Off between Task Accuracy, Task Completion Time and Naturalness for Direct Object Manipulation in Virtual Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
In most cases, hand tracking compared unfavorably against regular controllers for object manipulation tasks requiring precision.
“In most cases, hand tracking compared unfavorably against the regular controllers for object manipulation tasks [9-11,13,15,38] which require precision.”
From Trade-Off between Task Accuracy, Task Completion Time and Naturalness for Direct Object Manipulation in Virtual Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
Caggianese et al. [9] reported that completion times were significantly faster with the controller than with the hand interface.
“For example, Caggianese et al. [9] reported that completion times were significantly faster with the controller than with the hand interface”
From Trade-Off between Task Accuracy, Task Completion Time and Naturalness for Direct Object Manipulation in Virtual Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
The results are in line with related earlier studies where hand tracking compared unfavorably against regular controllers for object manipulation tasks.
“The results are in line with related earlier studies, e.g., [9-11,13,38] where hand tracking compared unfavorably against the regular controllers for object manipulation tasks.”
From Trade-Off between Task Accuracy, Task Completion Time and Naturalness for Direct Object Manipulation in Virtual Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Gusai, E., Bassano, C., Solari, F., & Chessa, M. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70742-6_27 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Open data exploration in virtual reality: a comparative study of input technology
Reski, N., & Alissandrakis, A. (2020) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-019-00378-w · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Kangas, J., Kumar, S. K., Mehtonen, H., Järnstedt, J., & Raisamo, R. (2022) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti6010006 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Caggianese, G., Gallo, L., & Neroni, P.
- Affiliations
- Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Caggianese, Giuseppe
- Venue
- Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018-06-12
- Pages
- 24-33
- ISSN
- 2190-3018 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-3026
- OpenAlex
- W2808351283
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Smart innovation, systems and technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- Leap Motion, hand tracking, virtual reality input devices, virtual object manipulation, interaction design, user preferences, low-cost input devices, virtual worlds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
