Cited by 37Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsInteractive and Immersive DisplaysHand Gesture Recognition Systems

Interaction in an Immersive Collaborative Virtual Reality Environment: A Comparison Between Leap Motion and HTC Controllers

Gusai, Elisa, Bassano, Chiara, Solari, Fabio, Chessa, Manuela·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-70742-6_27

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gusai, E., Bassano, C., Solari, F., & Chessa, M.
Affiliations
University of Genoa (IT)
Corresponding author
Chessa, Manuela
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2017
Pages
290-300
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2780035078
Cited by
37
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
Keywords
collaborative virtual reality, immersive virtual reality, hand gesture interaction, Leap Motion, object manipulation, positioning error, exergames

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review