Cited by 11Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and AnalyticsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Learning Cognitive Models Using Neural Networks

Open access
Chaplot, Devendra Singh, MacLellan, Christopher, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, Koedinger, Kenneth·2018·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_4

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems can adapt their behavior in real time according to the needs of individuals or to support collaborative learning.

    “One important area of AIED research has been Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs), which can adapt their behavior in real time according to the needs of individuals or to support collaborative learning [124].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [124]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Li, N., Stampfer, E., Cohen, W., Koedinger, K.: General and efficient cognitive model discovery using a simulated student. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Volume 35. (2013)
  2. [21]21. Pavlik, P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance factors analysis -a new alternative to knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems That Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, IOS Press (2009) 531-538

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaplot, D. S., MacLellan, C., Salakhutdinov, R., & Koedinger, K.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Chaplot, Devendra Singh
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2018
Pages
43-56
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2809473367
Cited by
11
References
25
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
ill-structured domains, adaptive tutoring systems, human learning, Chinese character learning, article selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review