The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Functional Causal Models with Generative Neural Networks
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It was also shown that the use of counterfactual explanations can help the user to understand the decision of a model [40, 42, 351].”
From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
GAN（Generative Adversarial Nets）
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1989) · Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems · doi:10.1007/bf02551274 · Cited by 13,883
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets
Mirza, M., & Osindero, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1784 · Cited by 8,863
Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks
Ganin, Y., Ustinova, E., Ajakan, H., Germain, P., Larochelle, H., Laviolette, F., Marchand, M., & Lempitsky, V. (2017) · Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58347-1_10 · Cited by 8,318
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Chickering, D. M. (2002). Optimal structure identification with greedy search. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Nov):507–554.
- Daniusis, P., Janzing, D., Mooij, J., Zscheischler, J., Steudel, B., Zhang, K., and Schölkopf, B. (2012). Inferring deterministic causal relations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.3475. · arXiv
- Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 2672–2680.
- Guyon, I. (2013). Chalearn cause effect pairs challenge.
- Guyon, I. (2014). Chalearn fast causation coefficient challenge.
- Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M. (2013). Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114. · arXiv
- Lopez-Paz, D. and Oquab, M. (2016). Revisiting classifier two-sample tests. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.06545. · arXiv
- Pearl, J. and Verma, T. (1991). A formal theory of inductive causation. University of California (Los Angeles). Computer Science Department.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294
Explanation Methods in Deep Learning: Users, Values, Concerns and Challenges
Ras, G., van Gerven, M., & Haselager, P. (2018) · The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98131-4_2 · Cited by 255
D’ya Like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discovery
Vowels, M. J., Camgoz, N. C., & Bowden, R. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3527154 · Cited by 237
Causal Confusion in Imitation LearningPreprint
de Haan, P., Jayaraman, D., & Levine, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11979 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Goudet, O., Kalainathan, D., Caillou, P., Guyon, I., Lopez-Paz, D., & Sebag, M.
- Affiliations
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Goudet, Olivier
- Venue
- The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 39-80
- ISSN
- 2520-131X (ISSN-L)
- 2520-1328
- OpenAlex
- W2755310417
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Springer series on challenges in machine learning (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- causal discovery, generative neural networks, maximum mean discrepancy, observational data, conditional independence, directed acyclic graphs, confounders, latent variables
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
