Factors Affecting Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning System in Higher Education Using UTAUT and Structural Equation Modeling Approaches
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facilitating conditions is a direct predictor of actual use.
“It is, nonetheless, also evident that facilitating conditions is a direct predictor of actual use [47,53].”
From A Study of the Adoption and Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): Identification of Moderators and Mediator (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · see citing works
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941 · see citing works
Determining sample size for research activities
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447003000308 · Cited by 18,930 · see citing works
Einax, J. W., Zwanziger, H. W., & Geiß, S. (1997) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/352760216x.ch5 · Cited by 18,779 · see citing works
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664 · see citing works
Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.00407 · Cited by 6,416 · see citing works
Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions
Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1974) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447403400104 · Cited by 1,657 · see citing works
Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning
Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x · Cited by 1,233 · see citing works
Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003 · Cited by 872 · see citing works
Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model
Mohammadi, H. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model
Al‐Gahtani, S. S. (2014) · Applied Computing and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Students Acceptance of Google Classroom: An Exploratory Study using PLS-SEM Approach
Al-Maroof, R. A. S., & Al-Emran, M. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8275 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education
Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1631 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Preservice Teachers’ Acceptance of Learning Management Software: An Application of the UTAUT2 Model
Raman, A. L., & Don, Y. (2013) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v6n7p157 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Applying the UTAUT to Understand Factors Affecting the Use of English E-Learning Websites in Taiwan
Tan, P. J. B. (2013) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244013503837 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Antecedents and consequences of e-learning acceptance
Cheng, Y. (2010) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00356.x · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Al-dweeri, R. M., Obeidat, Z. M., Al-Dwiry, M., Alshurideh, M. T., & Alhorani, A. (2017) · International Journal of Marketing Studies · doi:10.5539/ijms.v9n2p92 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Yoo, S. J., Han, S., & Huang, W. D. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.015 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Students Acceptance of Mobile Learning for Higher Education in Saudi Arabia
Nassuora, A. B. (2013) · International Journal of Learning Management Systems · doi:10.12785/ijlms/010101 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Liao, H.-L., & Lu, H. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.006 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Mou, J., Shin, D., & Cohen, J. F. (2016) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1203024 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Using Text Mining Techniques for Extracting Information from Research Articles
Salloum, S. A., Al‐Emran, M., Monem, A. A., et al. (2017) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67056-0_18 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationStudents' Attitudes Towards the Use of Mobile Technologies in e-Evaluation
Al‐Emran, M., & Salloum, S. A. (2017) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v11i5.6879 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationAlrawashdeh, T. A. (2012) · International Journal of Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.5121/ijcseit.2012.2205 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Assessing User Acceptance toward Blog Technology Using the UTAUT Model
Pardamean, B., & Susanto, M. (2012) · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Development of M-learning Application based on Knowledge Management Processes
Al‐Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., Kamaludin, A., & Alsinani, M. (2018) · International Conference on Software and Computer Applications (ICSCA) · doi:10.1145/3185089.3185120 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The Impact of Google Apps at Work: Higher Educational Perspective
Al‐Emran, M., & Malik, S. I. (2016) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v10i4.6181 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Factors Affect Mobile Phone Brand Choices – Studying the Case of Jordan Universities Students
Alshurideh, M. T., Bataineh, A. Q., Alkurdi, B., et al. (2015) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v8n3p141 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Academics' Awareness Towards Mobile Learning in Oman
Al‐Emran, M. (2017) · International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems · doi:10.12785/ijcds/060105 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Attitudes Towards the Use of Mobile Learning: A Case Study from the Gulf Region
Al‐Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. F. (2015) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v9i3.4596 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationAn analysis of ODL student perception and adoption behavior using the technology acceptance model
Khor, E. T. (2014) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1732 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Heinz, B., & MacFarlane, D. (2013) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244013503836 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Customer Service Retention - A Behavioural Perspective of the UK Mobile Market
Alshurideh, M. T. (2010) · Durham e-Theses (Durham University) · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ashkanani, A. (2017) · Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jang, M., Aavakare, M., Nikou, S., & Kim, S. (2021) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102154 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Uddin, M. A., Alam, M. S., Mamun, A. A., Khan, T.-U.-Z., & Akter, A. (2020) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc6010002 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“Salloum, S.A.; Shaalan, K. Factors Affecting Students’ Acceptance of E‐Learning System in Higher Education Using UTAUT and Structural Equation Modeling Approaches.”
BackgroundResultInfluential
- Authors
- Salloum, S. A., & Shaalan, K.
- Affiliations
- British University in Dubai (AE)
- Corresponding author
- Salloum, Said A.
- Venue
- Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2018-08-29
- Pages
- 469-480
- ISSN
- 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-5365
- OpenAlex
- W2888806208
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 32.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- e-learning adoption, technology acceptance, UTAUT, university students, behavioral intention, social influence, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, effort expectancy, university policy, United Arab Emirates University
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review