Cited by 128Technology Adoption and User BehaviourTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesOnline and Blended Learning

Factors Affecting Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning System in Higher Education Using UTAUT and Structural Equation Modeling Approaches

Salloum, Said A., Shaalan, Khaled·2019·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-99010-1_43

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salloum, S. A., & Shaalan, K.
Affiliations
British University in Dubai (AE)
Corresponding author
Salloum, Said A.
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Published
2018-08-29
Pages
469-480
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W2888806208
Cited by
128
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
32.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
e-learning adoption, technology acceptance, UTAUT, university students, behavioral intention, social influence, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, effort expectancy, university policy, United Arab Emirates University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review