Cited by 162Digital literacy in educationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourGender and Technology in Education

The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland

Open access
Jang, Moonkyoung, Aavakare, Milla, Nikou, Shahrokh, Kim, Seongcheol·2021·Telecommunications Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102154

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jang, M., Aavakare, M., Nikou, S., & Kim, S.
Affiliations
  • Hannam University (KR)
  • Åbo Akademi University (FI)
  • Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Seongcheol
Venue
Telecommunications Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
102154
ISSN
0308-5961 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154583655
Cited by
162
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13
FWCI
25.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telecommunications Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A3A2099973)
  • Academy of Finland (295743)
  • Iran Telecommunication Research Center (IITP-2020-0-01749)
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
  • Information Technology Research Centre
  • Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
digital literacy, information literacy, ICT-enabled learning, 21st century skills, habit, performance expectancy, technology acceptance, COVID-19 remote learning, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review