Cited by 1,017Semantic Web and OntologiesLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeLibrary Science and Information Systems

Web Ontology Language: OWL

Antoniou, Grigoris, van Harmelen, Frank·2004·Handbook on Ontologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antoniou, G., & van Harmelen, F.
Affiliations
University of Crete (GR)
Venue
Handbook on Ontologies
Published
2004
Pages
67-92
OpenAlex
W2624907881
Cited by
1,017
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 52
FWCI
126.19
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
Keywords
Web Ontology Language, owls, RDF Schema, ontology languages, OWL ontologies, semantic web, knowledge representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review