Cited by 70Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationSocial Robot Interaction and HRIRobotics and Automated Systems

Agents and robots for collaborating and supporting physicians in healthcare scenarios

Open access
Lanza, Francesco, Seidita, Valeria, Chella, Antonio·2020·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Monitoring patients through robotics telehealth systems is an interesting scenario where patients' conditions, and their environment, are dynamic and unknown variables. We propose to improve telehealth systems' features to include the ability to serve patients with their needs, operating as human caregivers. The objective is to support the independent living of patients at home without losing the opportunity to monitor their health status. Application scenarios are several, and they spread from simple clinical assisting scenarios to an emergency one. For instance, in the case of a nursing home, the system would support in continuously monitoring the elderly patients. In contrast, in the case of an epidemic diffusion, such as COVID-19 pandemic, the system may help in all the early triage phases, significantly reducing the risk of contagion. However, the system has to let medical assistants perform actions remotely such as changing therapies or interacting with patients that need support. The paper proposes and describes a multi-agent architecture for intelligent medical care. We propose to use the beliefs-desires-intentions agent architecture, part of it is devised to be deployed in a robot. The result is an intelligent system that may allow robots the ability to select the most useful plan for unhandled situations and to communicate the choice to the physician for his validation and permission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103483

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [10]D. Casey, So what have the roman’s researchers ever done for us-mario, in: 15th Annual School of Nursing & Midwifery Conference, NUI Galway, 2015.
  2. [17]Luperto M. Monroy J. Moreno F.-A. Ruiz-Sarmiento J.R. Basilico N. Gonzalez-Jimenez J. Borghese N.A. A multi-actor framework centered around an assistive mobile robot for elderly people living alone, in: Robots for Assisted Living Workshop-International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018
  3. [31]Bratman M.E. Intention, plans, and practical reason Vol. 10 1987 Harvard University Press Cambridge MA
  4. [33]Bordini R.H. Hübner J.F. BDI agent programming in AgentSpeak using Jason International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems 2005 Springer 143 164
  5. [36]Ferber J. Weiss G. Multi-agent systems: an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence Vol. 1 1999 Addison-Wesley Reading
  6. [42]A. Chella, F. Lanza, V. Seidita, Human-agent interaction, the system level using JASON, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Engineering Multi-Agent Systems (EMAS 2018). Stockholm, 2018.
  7. [53]Chella A. Lanza F. Pipitone A. Seidita V. Human-robot teaming: Perspective on analysis and implementation issues Vol. 2352 2019 CEUR-WS
  8. [54]A. Chella, F. Lanza, V. Seidita, A cognitive architecture for human-robot teaming interaction, Vol. 2418, CEUR-WS, 2019, pp. 82–89.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanza, F., Seidita, V., & Chella, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • Institute for High Performance Computing and Networking (IT)
Corresponding author
Lanza, Francesco
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
108
Pages
103483
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037334953
Cited by
70
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
Keywords
telemedicine, healthcare robots, multi-agent systems, remote patient monitoring, home care, elderly care, nursing homes, COVID-19 triage, emergency response, physician support
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Systems, Emergency Medicine, Geriatrics, Humans, Medical Informatics, Models, Theoretical, Monitoring, Physiologic, Nursing Homes, Pneumonia, Viral, Risk, Robotics, Telemedicine, Coronavirus Infections, Infectious Disease Medicine, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review