Cited by 614Cryptography and Data SecurityCryptographic Implementations and SecurityCoding theory and cryptography

Cryptographic Hash-Function Basics: Definitions, Implications, and Separations for Preimage Resistance, Second-Preimage Resistance, and Collision Resistance

Rogaway, Phillip, Shrimpton, Thomas·2004·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-25937-4_24

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogaway, P., & Shrimpton, T.
Affiliations
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2004
Pages
371-388
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2155690458
Cited by
614
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 32
FWCI
12.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
cryptographic hash functions, preimage resistance, second preimage resistance, collision resistance, security definitions, security implications, concrete security, provable security, counterexample

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review