Cited by 270Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Empirical Research Methods in Software Engineering

Wohlin, Claes, Höst, Martin, Henningsson, Kennet·2003·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-45143-3_2

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wohlin, C., Höst, M., & Henningsson, K.
Affiliations
  • Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2003
Pages
7-23
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1692158061
Cited by
270
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
empirical software engineering, research methodology, controlled experiments, case studies, surveys, post-mortem analysis, organizational challenges, project management, engineering decision-making, qualitative and quantitative data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review