The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empirical Research Methods in Software Engineering
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many overviews and guiding literature for SE researchers do not even include grounded theory (cf. [27, 77]).”
From Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines (2016) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,639
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,279
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
The Art of Case Study Research
Johnson, K. E., & Stake, R. E. (1996) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329758 · Cited by 15,860
David, F. N., & Tukey, J. W. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529486 · Cited by 12,707
The art of case study research
Savolainen, R. (1996) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(96)90053-5 · Cited by 8,169
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
McGinn, L. C. (1957) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(57)90766-4 · Cited by 7,284
Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Wilson, R. D., & Creswell, J. W. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152153 · Cited by 7,109
Handbook of Qualitative Research.
DeVault, M. L., Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076551 · Cited by 6,269
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Garvin, D.A.: Building a Learning Organization. In: Harward Business Review on Knowledge Management, pp. 47–80. Harward Business School Press, Boston (1998)
- Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: Experience Factory. In: Marciniak, J.J. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Software Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken (2002)
- Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous & Practical Approach, 2nd edn. International Thomson Computer Press (1996)
- Robson, C.: Real World Research, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden (2002)
- Robson, C.: Design and Statistics in Psychology, 3rd edn. Penguin Books, London (1994)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering
Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2009) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 · Cited by 3,862
Self-citationGrounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines
Stol, K.-J., Ralph, P., & Fitzgerald, B. (2016) · Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2884781.2884833 · Cited by 470
Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement—A Systematic Literature Review
Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., Islam, A., Cheng, C. K., Permadi, R. B., & FELDT, R. H. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2011.26 · Cited by 290
The Focus Group Method as an Empirical Tool in Software Engineering
Kontio, J., Bragge, J., & Lehtola, L. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_4 · Cited by 184
Requirements engineering: A systematic mapping study in agile software development
Curcio, K., Navarro, T., Malucelli, A., & Reinehr, S. (2018) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.036 · Cited by 169
Bosu, A., Carver, J. C., Bird, C., Orbeck, J. D., & Christopher, C. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2016.2576451 · Cited by 155
Nguyen‐Duc, A., Cruzes, D. S., & Conradi, R. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.06.002 · Cited by 138
A documentation framework for architecture decisions
van Heesch, U., Avgeriou, P., & Hilliard, R. (2011) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.017 · Cited by 116
Exploratory case study research: Outsourced project failure
Verner, J. M., & Abdullah, L. M. (2011) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.001 · Cited by 110
The Impact of Organizational Culture on Agile Method Use
Strode, D. E., Huff, S. L., & Tretiakov, A. (2009) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2009.436 · Cited by 110
García, I., Pacheco, C., Méndez, F., & Calvo-Manzano, J. A. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22304 · Cited by 115
Fuster-Guilló, A., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A. M., Azorín-López, J., Rico-Soliveres, M. L., & Restrepo‐Calle, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02843 · Cited by 104
Software evolution and maintenance
Rajlich, V. (2014) · Future of Software Engineering (FOSE) · doi:10.1145/2593882.2593893 · Cited by 101
The role of mentoring and project characteristics for onboarding in open source software projects
Fagerholm, F., Guinea, A. S., Münch, J., & Borenstein, J. (2014) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1145/2652524.2652540 · Cited by 97
Bukhsh, F. A., Bukhsh, Z. A., & Daneva, M. (2019) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2019.103389 · Cited by 91
Fuggetta, A., & Nitto, E. D. (2014) · Future of Software Engineering (FOSE) · doi:10.1145/2593882.2593883 · Cited by 81
Impact of design patterns on software quality: a systematic literature review
Wedyan, F. I., & Abufakher, S. (2019) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5446 · Cited by 92
Faults‐slip‐through—a concept for measuring the efficiency of the test process
Damm, L., Lundberg, L., & Wohlin, C. (2006) · Software Process Improvement and Practice · doi:10.1002/spip.253 · Cited by 62
Self-citationStandardisation in Digital Twin Architectures in Manufacturing
Ferko, E., Bucaioni, A., Pelliccione, P., & Behnam, M. (2023) · International Conference on Software Architecture · doi:10.1109/icsa56044.2023.00015 · Cited by 46
A Computer Science-Oriented Approach to Introduce Quantum Computing to a New Audience
Salehi, Ö., Seskir, Z. C., & Tepe, I. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2021.3078552 · Cited by 64
Industry practices and challenges for the evolvability assurance of microservices
Bogner, J., Fritzsch, J., Wagner, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2021) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-021-09999-9 · Cited by 58
Action Research Can Swing the Balance in Experimental Software Engineering
dos Santos, P. S. M., & Travassos, G. H. (2011) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385510-7.00005-9 · Cited by 55
Novel Virtual Environment for Alternative Treatment of Children with Cerebral Palsy
Oliveira, J. M., CarneiroG.Fernandes, R., Pinto, C. S., Pinheiro, P. R., Ribeiro, S. T. G., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C. (2016) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2016/8984379 · Cited by 51
Empirical Evaluation of Agile Software Development: The Controlled Case Study Approach
Salo, O., & Abrahamsson, P. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24659-6_29 · Cited by 47
A Survey on the Benefits and Drawbacks of AUTOSAR
Martínez‐Fernández, S., Ayala, C. P., Franch, X., & Nakagawa, E. Y. (2015) · doi:10.1145/2752489.2752493 · Cited by 45
Petrillo, F. D. S., & Pimenta, M. S. (2010) · ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC) · doi:10.1145/1878450.1878453 · Cited by 44
Towards an understanding of the causes and effects of software requirements change: two case studies
McGee, S., & Greer, D. (2012) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-012-0149-0 · Cited by 43
A survey on quality attributes in service-based systems
Ameller, D., Galster, M., Avgeriou, P., & Franch, X. (2015) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-015-9268-4 · Cited by 43
Yılmaz, M., O’Farrell, E., & Clarke, P. M. (2023) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2531 · Cited by 46
Improving the effectiveness of root cause analysis in post mortem analysis: A controlled experiment
Bjørnson, F. O., Wang, A. I., & Arisholm, E. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.02.003 · Cited by 42
Chueca, J., Verón, J., Font, J., Pérez, F., & Cetina, C. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107330 · Cited by 45
Positive affect through interactions in meetings: The role of proactive and supportive statements
Schneider, K. A., Klünder, J., Kortum, F., Handke, L., Straube, J., & Kauffeld, S. (2018) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.001 · Cited by 40
Software Engineering for Internet of Things: The Practitioners' Perspective
Fahmideh, M., Ahmad, A., Behnaz, A., Grundy, J., & Susilo, W. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2021.3070692 · Cited by 30
Results from introducing component-level test automation and Test-Driven Development
Damm, L., & Lundberg, L. (2005) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.015 · Cited by 38
Štemberger, M. I., Buh, B., Glavan, L. M., & Mendling, J. (2018) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-02-2017-0023 · Cited by 37
Uskarcı, A., & Demirörs, O. (2017) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2017.01.008 · Cited by 36
Responsible research and innovation key performance indicators in industry
Yaghmaei, E. (2018) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-11-2017-0066 · Cited by 36
Identifying contradictions in an incumbent–startup ecosystem–an activity theory approach
Baloutsos, S., Karagiannaki, A., & Pramatari, K. (2022) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-04-2020-0114 · Cited by 35
A method to evaluate the openness of automation tools for increased interoperability
Fay, A., Biffl, S., Winkler, D., Drath, R., & Barth, M. (2013) · Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON) · doi:10.1109/iecon.2013.6700266 · Cited by 34
Migration of monolithic systems to microservices: A systematic mapping study
Saucedo, A. M., Rodríguez, G., Rocha, F. G., & dos Santos, R. P. (2024) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107590 · Cited by 33
Two Architectural Threat Analysis Techniques Compared
Tuma, K., & Scandariato, R. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00761-4_23 · Cited by 32
Retest test selection for product-line regression testing of variants and versions of variants
Lity, S., Nieke, M., Thüm, T., & Schaefer, I. (2018) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.090 · Cited by 31
The use of empirical methods in Open Source Software research: Facts, trends and future directions
Stol, K.-J., Babar, M. A., Russo, B., & Fitzgerald, B. F. (2009) · ICSE Workshop on Emerging Trends in Free/Libre/Open Source Software Research and Development (FLOSS) · doi:10.1109/floss.2009.5071355 · Cited by 30
Galster, M., Avgeriou, P., & Tofan, D. (2012) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.09.011 · Cited by 30
A domain-specific language for describing machine learning datasets
Giner-Miguelez, J., Gómez, A., & Cabot, J. (2023) · Journal of Computer Languages · doi:10.1016/j.cola.2023.101209 · Cited by 29
Software integration in global software development: Challenges for GSD vendors
Ilyas, M., & Khan, S. U. (2017) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.1875 · Cited by 32
Empirical software product line engineering: A systematic literature review
Chacón-Luna, A. E., Fernández, A. M. G., Galindo, J. Á., & Benavides, D. (2020) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106389 · Cited by 28
A proposed model for reuse of software requirements in requirements catalog
Pacheco, C., García, I., Calvo-Manzano, J. A., & Arcilla, M. (2014) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.1698 · Cited by 28
A guidance to implement or reinforce a DevOps approach in organizations: A case study
Muñoz, M., & Negrete, M. (2021) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2342 · Cited by 26
A Mapping Study on Product Owners in Industry: Identifying Future Research Directions
Unger‐Windeler, C., Klünder, J., & Schneider, K. A. (2019) · International Conference on Software and System Process · doi:10.1109/icssp.2019.00026 · Cited by 25
Software requirements change taxonomy: Evaluation by case study
McGee, S., & Greer, D. (2011) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2011.6051641 · Cited by 24
den Besten, M., Amrit, C., Capiluppi, A., & Robles, G. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.3015969 · Cited by 24
Not All Requirements Prioritization Criteria are Equal at All Times: A Quantitative Analysis
Svensson, R. B., & Torkar, R. (2022) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111909 · Cited by 37
Handling Variability in Software Architecture: Problems and Implications
Galster, M., & Avgeriou, P. (2011) · Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA) · doi:10.1109/wicsa.2011.30 · Cited by 24
Mokammel, F., Coatanéa, É., Coatanéa, J., Nenchev, V., Blanco, É., & Pietola, M. T. (2018) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21461 · Cited by 24
de la Vara, J. L. (2011) · doi:10.4995/thesis/10251/11445 · Cited by 24
The Psychological Effects of AI-Assisted Programming on Students and Professionals
Valový, M., & Buchalcevova, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) · doi:10.1109/icsme58846.2023.00050 · Cited by 23
Collaborative Traceability Management: Challenges and Opportunities
Wohlrab, R., Steghöfer, J.-P., Knauss, E., Maro, S., & Anjorin, A. (2016) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2016.17 · Cited by 23
How Much Authenticity can be Achieved in Software Engineering Project Based Courses?
Abad, Z. S. H., Bano, M., & Zowghi, D. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET) · doi:10.1109/icse-seet.2019.00030 · Cited by 27
Pires, P. F., Delicato, F. C., Cóbe, R., Batista, T., Davis, J. G., & Song, J. H. (2011) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-011-0116-1 · Cited by 22
An approach based on design practices to specify requirements in agile projects
de Medeiros, J. D. R. V., de Vasconcelos, A. M. L., Goulão, M., Silva, C., & Araújo, J. (2017) · ACM Symposium on Applied Computing · doi:10.1145/3019612.3019753 · Cited by 21
Analysing Interoperability in Digital Twin Software Architectures for Manufacturing
Ferko, E., Bucaioni, A., Pelliccione, P., & Behnam, M. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42592-9_12 · Cited by 20
Making the case for measuring mental effort
Zugal, S., Pinggera, J., Reijers, H. A., Reichert, M., & Weber, B. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2424563.2424571 · Cited by 20
Lightweight Risk Management in Agile Projects
Odzaly, E. E., Greer, D., & Stewart, D. (2014) · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · doi:10.13140/2.1.4681.0882 · Cited by 20
James, T., Galster, M., Blincoe, K., & Miller, G. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip.2017.31 · Cited by 20
Configuration lifecycle management maturity model
Myrodia, A., Randrup, T. B., & Hvam, L. (2019) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.006 · Cited by 20
Unger‐Windeler, C., Klünder, J., Reuscher, T. R., & Schneider, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2311 · Cited by 20
Requirements management in DevOps environments: a multivocal mapping study
Hernández, R., Morós, B., & Nicolás, J. (2023) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-023-00396-w · Cited by 19
A Systematic Literature Review of Model-Driven Engineering Using Machine Learning
Marcén, A. C., Iglesias, A., Lapeña, R., Pérez, F., & Cetina, C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3430514 · Cited by 24
Dealing with Belief Uncertainty in Domain Models
Burgueño, L., Muñoz, P., Clarisó, R., Cabot, J., Gérard, S., & Vallecillo, A. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3542947 · Cited by 18
Software integration model: An assessment tool for global software development vendors
Ilyas, M., Khan, S. U., Khan, H. U., & Rashid, N. (2023) · Journal of Software Evolution and Process · doi:10.1002/smr.2540 · Cited by 21
Handling non-functional requirements in Model-Driven Development: An ongoing industrial survey
Ameller, D., Franch, X., Gómez, C., Araújo, J., Svensson, R. B., Biffl, S., Cabot, J., Cortellessa, V., Daneva, M., Méndez, D., et al. (2015) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2015.7320424 · Cited by 18
Tian, F., Liang, P., & Babar, M. A. (2021) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106705 · Cited by 18
Practitioner Evaluations on Software Testing Tools
Raulamo-Jurvanen, P., Hosio, S. J., & Mäntylä, M. (2019) · International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) · doi:10.1145/3319008.3319018 · Cited by 18
Pacheco, C., García, I., Calvo-Manzano, J. A., & Arcilla, M. (2016) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-015-0243-1 · Cited by 16
CRUISE: A platform for crowdsourcing Requirements Elicitation and evolution
Sharma, R., & Sureka, A. (2017) · International Conference on Contemporary Computing · doi:10.1109/ic3.2017.8284308 · Cited by 16
Lambiase, S., Catolino, G., Tamburri, D. A., Serebrenik, A., Palomba, F., & Ferrucci, F. (2022) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS) · doi:10.1109/icse-seis55304.2022.9793992 · Cited by 16
Data collection in global software engineering research: learning from past experience
Prikladnicki, R., Boden, A., Avram, G., de Souza, C. R. B., & Wulf, V. (2013) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-012-9240-x · Cited by 16
A framework for software reference architecture analysis and review
Martínez‐Fernández, S., Ayala, C. P., Franch, X., Marques, H. M., & Ameller, D. (2013) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · Cited by 15
Peixoto, M., Silva, C., Araújo, J., Gorschek, T., de Vasconcelos, A. M. L., & Vilela, J. (2022) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-022-00388-2 · Cited by 14
What do we know about requirements management in software ecosystems?
Malcher, P. R. C., Silva, E., Viana, D., & dos Santos, R. P. (2023) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-023-00407-w · Cited by 14
Architectural design decision visualization for architecture design
Shahin, M., Liang, P., & Li, Z. (2011) · European Conference on Software Architecture · doi:10.1145/2031759.2031762 · Cited by 14
Naive Architecting- Understanding the Reasoning Process of Students A Descriptive Survey
van Heesch, U., & Avgeriou, P. (2016) · Cited by 14
Wimalasooriya, C., Licorish, S. A., da Costa, D. A., & MacDonell, S. G. (2021) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2021.111166 · Cited by 14
Identifying domain elements from textual specifications
Thakur, J. S., & Gupta, A. K. (2016) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/2970276.2970323 · Cited by 14
Ivan, G., Pacheco, C., & Calvo-Manzano, J. A. (2019) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5246 · Cited by 14
Gonzalez-Barahona, J. M., & Robles, G. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107318 · Cited by 26
A model-driven approach to reengineering processes in cloud computing
Fahmideh, M., Grundy, J., Beydoun, G., Zowghi, D., Susilo, W., & Mougouei, D. (2021) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106795 · Cited by 13
Shahin, M., Liang, P., & Li, Z. (2014) · International Conference on Program Comprehension · doi:10.1145/2597008.2597139 · Cited by 13
Software Architecture Design of Cloud Platforms in Automotive Domain: An Online Survey
Banijamali, A., Heisig, P., Kristan, J., Kuvaja, P., & Oivo, M. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA) · doi:10.1109/soca.2019.00032 · Cited by 13
Empirical Validation of Software Integration Practices in Global Software Development
Ilyas, M., Khan, S. U., & Rashid, N. (2020) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-020-00175-2 · Cited by 14
Towards a recipe for language decomposition: quality assessment of language product lines
Cazzola, W., & Favalli, L. (2022) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-021-10074-6 · Cited by 12
Technological support for distributed agile development
Dullemond, K., & van Gameren, B. (2009) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 12
Lambiase, S., Catolino, G., Pecorelli, F., Tamburri, D. A., Palomba, F., van den Heuvel, W., & Ferrucci, F. (2023) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111878 · Cited by 18
A fuzzy-AHP-based approach to select software architecture based on quality attributes (FASSA)
Moaven, S., & Habibi, J. (2020) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-020-01496-7 · Cited by 11
Sustainable Smart Cities - A Vision for Tomorrow
Almusaed, A., & Almssad, A. (2022) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.100727 · Cited by 11
User Studies on End-User Service Composition
Zhao, L., Loucopoulos, P., Kavakli, E., & Letsholo, K. J. (2019) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3340294 · Cited by 11
Damm, L., & Lundberg, L. (2005) · International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/isese.2005.1541824 · Cited by 11
Global Teams: Futuristic Models of Collaborative Work for Today's Software Development Industry
Dafoulas, G. A., Swigger, K. M., Brazile, R. P., Alpaslan, F. N., López-Cabrera, V., & Serçe, F. C. (2009) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2009.231 · Cited by 11
Software product line testing: a systematic literature review
Agh, H., Azamnouri, A., & Wagner, S. (2024) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-024-10516-x · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Wohlin, C., Höst, M., & Henningsson, K.
- Affiliations
- Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 7-23
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1692158061
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- empirical software engineering, research methodology, controlled experiments, case studies, surveys, post-mortem analysis, organizational challenges, project management, engineering decision-making, qualitative and quantitative data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review