The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Requirements engineering: A systematic mapping study in agile software development
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies on changes in requirements and change management lack attention in research.
“However, studies on changes in requirements [19], and change management lacks attention in research [20], [21], [22].”
From A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234
Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8 · Cited by 3,239 · cited 2×
“It often gives a visual summary, the map, of its results ( Petersen et al., 2008 ).”
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668 · cited 1×
“Since the agile manifesto was released a lot of research has been intensively developed to explore the agile software development ( Dybå and Dingsøyr, 2008; Diebold and Dahlem, 2014 ).”
Empirical Research Methods in Software Engineering
Wohlin, C., Höst, M., & Henningsson, K. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45143-3_2 · Cited by 270
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Dingsøyr, 2012, A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development, J. Syst. Softw., 85, 1213, 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033 · DOI
- Inayat, 2015, A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges, Comput. Hum. Behav., 51, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.046 · DOI
- Eghariani, 2016, Review on Agile requirements engineering challenges, 507
- Heck, 2016, A systematic literature review on quality criteria for agile requirements specifications
- Silva, 2011, User-centered design and agile methods: a systematic review, 2011, 77
- Wang, 2012, “Leagile” software development: an experience report analysis of the application of lean approaches in agile software development, J. Syst. Softw., 85, 1287, 10.1016/j.jss.2012.01.061 · DOI
- Wohlin, 2013, On the reliability of mapping studies in software engineering, J. Syst. Softw., 86, 2594, 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.076 · DOI
- Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
- ISO/IEC/IEEE, ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2011 Systems and software engineering – life cycle processes – requirements engineering, 2011.
- Wieringa, 2006, Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion, Requir. Eng., 11, 102, 10.1007/s00766-005-0021-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Cao, 2008, Agile requirements engineering practices: an empirical study, IEEE Softw., 25, 60, 10.1109/MS.2008.1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering
Madampe, K., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3253145 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Curcio, K., Navarro, T., Malucelli, A., & Reinehr, S.
- Affiliations
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Reinehr, Sheila
- Venue
- Journal of Systems and Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 32-50
- ISSN
- 0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793921910
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 22.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
- Keywords
- requirements engineering, agile software development, requirements analysis, requirements change management, SWEBOK, research gaps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
