The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locally Optimized RANSAC
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions
Matas, J., Chum, O., Urban, M., & Pajdla, T. (2004) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2004.02.006 · Cited by 3,686
Self-citationMLESAC: A New Robust Estimator with Application to Estimating Image Geometry
Torr, P. H. S., & Zisserman, A. (2000) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.1999.0832 · Cited by 2,396
Robust Wide Baseline Stereo from Maximally Stable Extremal Regions
Matas, J., Chum, O., Urban, M., & Pajdla, T. (2002) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2002 · doi:10.5244/c.16.36 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationIn defence of the 8-point algorithm
Hartley, R. I. (2002) · Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1995.466816 · Cited by 649
Wide Baseline Stereo Matching based on Local, Affinely Invariant Regions
Tuytelaars, T., & Gool, L. V. (2000) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2000 · doi:10.5244/c.14.38 · Cited by 450
Randomized RANSAC with T, test
Matas, J., & Chum, O. (2004) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2004.02.009 · Cited by 281
Self-citationPritchett, P., & Zisserman, A. (2002) · Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1998.710802 · Cited by 279
Robust Recognition Using Eigenimages
Leonardis, A., & Bischof, H. (2000) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.1999.0830 · Cited by 262
Outlier detection and motion segmentation:
Torr, P. H. S., & Murray, D. W. (1993) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.150246 · Cited by 205
Cited by
Image Matching from Handcrafted to Deep Features: A Survey
Ma, J., Jiang, X., Fan, A., Jiang, J., & Yan, J. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01359-2 · Cited by 990
Scene Coordinate Regression Forests for Camera Relocalization in RGB-D Images
Shotton, J., Glocker, B., Zach, C., Izadi, S., Criminisi, A., & Fitzgibbon, A. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.377 · Cited by 930
USAC: A Universal Framework for Random Sample Consensus
Raguram, R., Chum, O., Pollefeys, M., Matas, J., & Frahm, J.-M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.257 · Cited by 676
Self-citationVisual Odometry : Part II: Matching, Robustness, Optimization, and Applications
Fraundorfer, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2012) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2012.2182810 · Cited by 620
DSAC — Differentiable RANSAC for Camera Localization
Brachmann, E., Krull, A., Nowozin, S., Shotton, J., Michel, F., Gumhold, S., & Rother, C. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.267 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Chum, O., Matas, J., & Kittler, J.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 236-243
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2130017587
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locally Optimized RANSAC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-45243-0_31
- The paper
- Chum, O., Matas, J., & Kittler, J. (2003). Locally Optimized RANSAC. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45243-0_31
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
