The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
More Accurate Student Modeling through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing
Open accessAbstract
Modeling students' knowledge is a fundamental part of intelligent tutoring systems. One of the most popular methods for estimating students' knowledge is Corbett and Anderson's [6] Bayesian Knowledge Tracing model. The model uses four parameters per skill, fit using student performance data, to relate performance to learning. Beck [1] showed that existing methods for determining these parameters are prone to the Identifiability Problem:the same performance data can be fit equally well by different parameters, with different implications on system behavior. Beck offered a solution based on Dirichlet Priors [1], but, we show this solution is vulnerable to a different problem, Model Degeneracy, where parameter values violate the model's conceptual meaning (such as a student being more likely to get a correct answer if he/she does not know a skill than if he/she does).We offer a new method for instantiating Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, using machine learning to make contextual estimations of the probability that a student has guessed or slipped. This method is no more prone to problems with Identifiability than Beck's solution, has less Model Degeneracy than competing approaches, and fits student performance data better than prior methods. Thus, it allows for more accurate and reliable student modeling in ITSs that use knowledge tracing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge
Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995) · User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/bf01099821 · Cited by 2,324
Self-citation
Cited by
Enhancing the prediction of student performance based on the machine learning XGBoost algorithm
Asselman, A., Khaldi, M., & Aammou, S. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1928235 · Cited by 490
A Data Repository for the EDM Community: The PSLC DataShop
(2010) · Handbook of Educational Data Mining · doi:10.1201/b10274-10 · Cited by 322
AI-assisted knowledge assessment techniques for adaptive learning environments
Minn, S. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100050 · Cited by 166
Saint+: Integrating temporal features for ednet correctness prediction
Shin, D., Shim, Y., Yu, H., Lee, S., Kim, B., & Choi, Y. (2021) · LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference · doi:10.1145/3448139.3448188 · Cited by 141
Guo, L., Wang, D., Gu, F., Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhou, R. (2021) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-021-09697-7 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, R. S. J. D., Corbett, A. T., & Aleven, V.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 406-415
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1597703949
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: More Accurate Student Modeling through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44
- The paper
- Baker, R. S. J. D., Corbett, A. T., & Aleven, V. (2008). More Accurate Student Modeling through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.