The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilingual Plagiarism Detection
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research on crosslingual plagiarism detection has attracted attention in recent few years [20], [27], [31], [36], [38], [108], thus focusing on text similarity computation across languages.”
From Understanding Plagiarism Linguistic Patterns, Textual Features, and Detection Methods (2012) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval
Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0 · Cited by 9,740
Journal of Universal Computer Science
Salomaa, A. K., Calude, C. S., & Maurer, H. A. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.3217/jucs-000-00-0109 · Cited by 3,393
AnO(ND) difference algorithm and its variations
Myers, E. W. (1986) · Algorithmica · doi:10.1007/bf01840446 · Cited by 893
Detection of Duplicate Defect Reports Using Natural Language Processing
Runeson, P., Alexandersson, M., & Nyholm, O. (2007) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/icse.2007.32 · Cited by 526
(1995) · Cited by 296
Cross-language plagiarism detection
Potthast, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Stein, B., & Rosso, P. (2011) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-009-9114-z · Cited by 286
Inferring a Semantic Representation of Text via Cross-Language Correlation Analysis
Vinokourov, A., Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. S. (2002) · Cited by 225
Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972-1984: A cocitation analysis
Culnan, M. J., O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1990) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 178
Plagiarism in natural and programming languages: an overview of current tools and technologies
Clough, P. D. (2000) · Cited by 153
The state of retrieval system evaluation
Salton, G. (1992) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(92)90002-h · Cited by 132
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lane, P., Lyon, C., Malcolm, J.: Demonstration of the Ferret Plagiarism Detector. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Plagiarism Conference, Newcastle, UK (2006)
Cited by
Understanding Plagiarism Linguistic Patterns, Textual Features, and Detection Methods
Alzahrani, S. M., Salim, N., & Abraham, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2134847 · Cited by 299
Cross-language plagiarism detection
Potthast, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Stein, B., & Rosso, P. (2011) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-009-9114-z · Cited by 286
A New Approach for Cross-Language Plagiarism Analysis
Corezola Pereira, R., Moreira, V. P., & Galante, R. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15998-5_4 · Cited by 35
Cross-Language Plagiarism Detection: Methods, Tools, and Challenges: A Systematic Review
Botto-Tobar, M., Serebrenik, A., & Van den Brand, M. G. J. (2022) · International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.18517/ijaseit.12.2.14711 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Ceska, Z., Toman, M., & Jezek, K.
- Affiliations
- University of West Bohemia in Pilsen (CZ)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2008-08-23
- Pages
- 83-92
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1496503889
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 27.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- EuroWordNet, synonym replacement, text similarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
