The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Language Plagiarism Detection: Methods, Tools, and Challenges: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Plagiarism is one of the most serious academic offenses. However, people have adopted different approaches to avoid plagiarism, such as transcribing excerpts from one language. Thus, it is challenging to realize this plagiarism form unless someone fully understands another language. Researchers have developed approaches for detecting plagiarism in a variety of different languages. However, most methods created in the past have proved effective for detecting plagiarism in papers published in a single language, most notably English. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a systematic literature review of cross-language plagiarism detection methods (CLPD) in a natural language context. The approach used to perform this study consisted of an extensive search for relevant literature through an SLR and Snowballing. Therefore, we present an overview of (i) cross-language plagiarism detection techniques; (ii)the artifacts and the aspects that were considered in the evaluation phase; and(iii) the lack of guidelines and tools for its implementation. Its contribution lies in its ability to highlight emerging cross-language plagiarism detection techniques trends. Further, we identify any of these techniques in other domains, for instance, software engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234 · cited 3×
“Further, the search-based approach is sensitive to the choice of the keywords, so to compensate for this, we have performed the snowballing method [11].”
BackgroundMethodUnderstanding Plagiarism Linguistic Patterns, Textual Features, and Detection Methods
Alzahrani, S. M., Salim, N., & Abraham, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2134847 · Cited by 299
Cross-language plagiarism detection
Potthast, M., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Stein, B., & Rosso, P. (2011) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-009-9114-z · Cited by 286
A New Approach for Cross-Language Plagiarism Analysis
Corezola Pereira, R., Moreira, V. P., & Galante, R. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15998-5_4 · Cited by 35
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Detecting Automatic Software Plagiarism via Token Sequence Normalization
Sağlam, T., Brödel, M., Schmid, L., & Hahner, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3597503.3639192 · Cited by 9
Dilber, C., & Yoşumaz, İ. (2026) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-025-09681-5 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Botto-Tobar, M., Serebrenik, A., & Van den Brand, M. G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Guayaquil (EC)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Botto-Tobar, Miguel
- Venue
- International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology
- Publisher
- Insight Society
- Published
- 2022-04-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 589-599
- ISSN
- 2088-5334 (ISSN-L)
- 2460-6952
- OpenAlex
- W4225147575
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- plagiarism detection, multilingual text, academic integrity, evaluation metrics, software plagiarism, natural language processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Language Plagiarism Detection: Methods, Tools, and Challenges: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18517/ijaseit.12.2.14711
- The paper
- Botto-Tobar, M., Serebrenik, A., & Van den Brand, M. G. J. (2022). Cross-Language Plagiarism Detection: Methods, Tools, and Challenges: A Systematic Review. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.12.2.14711