Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning with Virtual Verbal Displays: Effects of Interface Fidelity on Cognitive Map Development

Giudice, Nicholas A., Tietz, Jerome D.·2008·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_11
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_11

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Giudice, N.A.: Navigating novel environments: A comparison of verbal and visual learning, Unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (2004)
  2. Giudice, N.A., Bakdash, J.Z., Legge, G.E.: Wayfinding with words: Spatial learning and navigation using dynamically-updated verbal descriptions. Psychological Research 71(3), 347–358 (2007) · DOI

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Giudice, N. A., & Tietz, J. D.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2008
Pages
121-137
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_11
Cited by
9
References
42
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.