Cited by 1,244Semantic Web and OntologiesBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What Is an Ontology?

Guarino, Nicola, Oberle, Daniel, Staab, Steffen·2009·Handbook on Ontologies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ontologies serve as a means to formally model concepts from a specific domain by providing a detailed specification of entities, their properties, and their relations.

    “To achieve this, ontologies serve as a means to formally model concepts from a specific domain by providing a detailed specification of entities, their properties, and their relations (Guarino et al. 2009).”
  • The ontology aims to reduce the variability of tags and ensures that the classification of memories remains more consistent, allowing categorization and relation of memories to broader contexts.

    “The ontology aims to reduce the variability of tags and ensures that the classification of memories remains more consistent, allowing to categorize and relate memories to broader contexts [20].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. W. Borst. Construction of Engineering Ontologies. PhD thesis, Institute for Telematica and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1997.
  2. R. Carnap. Meaning and Necessity – A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. The University of Chicago Press, second edition, 1956.
  3. S. K. Das. Deductive Databases and Logic Programming. Addison Wesley, 1992.
  4. D. R. Dowty, R. Wall, and S. Peters. Introduction to Montague Semantics, volume 11 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Springer, Heidelberg, 1980. · DOI
  5. M. R. Genesereth and N. J. Nilsson. Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, 1987.
  6. T. R. Gruber. Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In N. Guarino and R. Poli, editors, Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Deventer, The Netherlands, 1993.
  7. T. R. Gruber. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199–220, 1993. · DOI
  8. T. R. Gruber. Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 43(5–6):907–928, 1995. · DOI · Paper page
  9. N. Guarino and P. Giaretta. Ontologies and Knowledge Bases: Towards a Terminological Clarification. In N. Mars, editor, Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing, pages 25–32. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1995.
  10. N. Guarino. Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In N. Guarino, editor, Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS'98, Trento, Italy, June 6-8, 1998, pages 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998.
  11. J. Hendler. Agents and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):30–37, 2001. · DOI
  12. C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London, tenth edition, 1923.
  13. P. Øhrstrøm, J. Andersen, and H. Schärfe. What has happened to ontology. In F. Dau, M.-L. Mugnier, and G. Stumme, editors, Conceptual Structures: Common Semantics for Sharing Knowledge, 13th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2005, Kassel, Germany, July 17–22, 2005, Proceedings, volume 3596 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 425–438. Springer, Heidelberg, 2005. · DOI
  14. B. Smith. Beyond Concepts: Ontology as Reality Representation. In A. C. Varzi and L. Vieu, editors, Formal Ontology in Information Systems – Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004), pages 73–85. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2004.
  15. R. Studer, R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel. Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 25(1–2):161–198, 1998. · DOI
  16. W. Swartout and A. Tate. Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1):18–19, 1999. · DOI
  17. M. Uschold. Ontologies and Semantics for Seamless Connectivity. SIGMOD Record, 33(4):58–64, 2004. · DOI
  18. R. L. Vaught. Alfred Tarski's Work in Model Theory. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 51(4):869–882, 1986. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guarino, N., Oberle, D., & Staab, S.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Corresponding author
Guarino, Nicola
Venue
Handbook on Ontologies
Published
2009
Pages
1-17
OpenAlex
W153886719
Cited by
1,244
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 46
FWCI
66.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
ontology (information science), computational ontology, conceptualization, knowledge engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review