The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web Ontology Language: OWL
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antoniou, G., & van Harmelen, F. (2004) · Handbook on Ontologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_4 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationDescription Logic Programs: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic
Grosof, B., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., & Decker, S. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.460986 · Cited by 794
Baader, F. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03754-2_1 · Cited by 427
McGuinness, D. L. (2003) · Spinning the Semantic Web · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6412.003.0008 · Cited by 414
The Resource Description Framework (RDF) and its Vocabulary Description Language RDFS
McBride, B. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_3 · Cited by 207
Reviewing the design of DAML+OIL: an ontology language for the semantic web
Horrocks, I. R., Patel‐Schneider, P. F., & van Harmelen, F. (2002) · doi:10.5555/777092.777214 · Cited by 135
Self-citationThe semantic web: a brain for humankind
Fensel, D., & Musen, M. A. (2001) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2001.920595 · Cited by 124
Baader, F., Horrocks, I. R., & Sattler, U. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_1 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey
Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.042313.00197 · Cited by 2,861
Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions
Bodenreider, O. (2006) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbl027 · Cited by 377
Event-based media processing and analysis: A survey of the literature
Tzelepis, C., Ma, Z., Mezaris, V., Ionescu, B., Kompatsiaris, I., Boato, G., Sebe, N., & Yan, S. (2016) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2016.05.005 · Cited by 49
A survey of structured P2P systems for RDF data storage and retrieval
Filali, I., Bongiovanni, F., Huet, F., & Baude, F. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23074-5_2 · Cited by 19
CS-KG 2.0: A Large-scale Knowledge Graph of Computer Science
Dessí, D., Osborne, F., Buscaldi, D., Reforgiato Recupero, D., & Motta, E. (2025) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05200-8 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Antoniou, G., & Harmelen, F. V.
- Venue
- Handbook on Ontologies
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 91-110
- OpenAlex
- W1971094449
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 52.92
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web Ontology Language: OWL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_4
- The paper
- Antoniou, G., & Harmelen, F. V. (2009). Web Ontology Language: OWL. Handbook on Ontologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
