The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ontologies Come of Age
Abstract
Ontologies have moved beyond the domains of library science, philosophy, and knowledge representation. They are now the concerns of marketing departments, CEOs, and mainstream business. Research analyst companies such as Forrester Research report on the critical roles of ontologies in support of browsing and search for e-commerce and in support of interoperability for facilitation of knowledge management and configuration. One now sees ontologies used as central controlled vocabularies that are integrated into catalogues, databases, web publications, knowledge management applications, etc. Large ontologies are essential components in many online applications including search (such as Yahoo and Lycos), ecommerce (such as Amazon and eBay), configuration (such as Dell and PC-Order), etc. One also sees ontologies that have long life spans, sometimes in multiple projects (such as UMLS, SIC codes, etc.). Such diverse usage generates many implications for ontology environments. In this paper, we will discuss ontologies and requirements in their current instantiations on the web today. We will describe some desirable properties of ontologies. We will also discuss how both simple and complex ontologies are being and may be used to support varied applications. We will conclude with a discussion of emerging trends in ontologies and their environments and briefly mention our evolving ontology evolution environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE
Minsky, M. (1988) · Readings in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50018-2 · Cited by 4,536
A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies
Gruber, T. O. (1993) · Knowledge Acquisition · Cited by 1,787
Berners‐Lee, T. (1999) · Cited by 832
The role of frame-based representation in reasoning
Fikes, R., & Kehler, T. (1985) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/4284.4285 · Cited by 823
Woods, W. A. (1975) · Representation and Understanding · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-108550-6.50007-0 · Cited by 792
The Ontolingua Server : a Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction
Farquhar, A. (1996) · Cited by 682
What IS-A Is and Isn't: An Analysis of Taxonomic Links in Semantic Networks
Brachman (1983) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.1983.1654194 · Cited by 571
An environment for merging and testing large ontologies
McGuinness, D. L., Fikes, R. E., Rice, J. P., & Wilder, S. (2000) · Cited by 559
Self-citationThe Ontolingua Server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction
Farquhar, A., Fikes, R. E., & Rice, J. P. (1997) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0121 · Cited by 460
The semantic Web and its languages
Lassila, O., van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I., Hendler, J., & McGuinness, D. L. (2000) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/5254.895864 · Cited by 442
Self-citation
Cited by
Antoniou, G., & van Harmelen, F. (2004) · Handbook on Ontologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_4 · Cited by 1,017
Antoniou, G., & Harmelen, F. V. (2009) · Handbook on Ontologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_4 · Cited by 398
Ethnopharmacological field studies: A critical assessment of their conceptual basis and methods
Heinrich, M., Edwards, S., Moerman, D. E., & Leonti, M. (2009) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2009.03.043 · Cited by 398
Medelyan, O., Milne, D., Legg, C., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.05.004 · Cited by 357
Ontologies and Knowledge Graphs in Oncology Research
Silva, M. C., Eugénio, P., Faria, D., & Pesquita, C. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14081906 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- McGuinness, D. L.
- Venue
- Spinning the Semantic Web
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Published
- 2003-01-27
- Pages
- 171-194
- OpenAlex
- W2158606791
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 52.10
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ontologies Come of Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7551/mitpress/6412.003.0008
- The paper
- McGuinness, D. L. (2003). Ontologies Come of Age. Spinning the Semantic Web. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6412.003.0008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.