Open Source Is Changing the Way Work Gets Done
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peters (2009) referred to potentially harmful effects of a large number of paid developers in a project: intrinsic motivations that attracted a developer can erode and be replaced by purely economic ones.
“Peters (2009) se ha referido a efectos potencialmente perjudiciales de un gran número de desarrolladores pagos en un proyecto: las motivaciones intrínsecas que atrajeron a un desarrollador pueden erosionarse y reemplazarse por una puramente económica.”
From Desarrollo Floss y gobernanza de pares: el caso del entorno de escritorio Gnome (2020) · cites this paper as Peters, 2009
The paper’s text on p. 1 describes collaboration between individuals and companies, meritocracy, and new ways of working. Searches for paid developers and for intrinsic motivation being replaced by economic motivation found no passage addressing the claimed harmful effect. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Open source in Swedish companies: where are we?
Lundell, B., Lings, B., & Lindqvist, E. (2010) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00348.x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
The Contribution of Open Frameworks to Life Cycle Assessment
Sayan, B. (2011) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Desarrollo Floss y gobernanza de pares: el caso del entorno de escritorio Gnome
Zanotti, A., & Vélez, J. G. (2020) · International Journal of Innovation · doi:10.5585/iji.v8i3.17114 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Peters (2009) se ha referido a efectos potencialmente perjudiciales de un gran número de desarrolladores pagos en un proyecto: las motivaciones intrínsecas que atrajeron a un desarrollador pueden erosionarse y reemplazarse por una puramente económica.”
- Authors
- Peters, S.
- Corresponding author
- Peters, Stormy
- Venue
- IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4238
- OpenAlex
- W2155371277
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Communication › Wikis in Education and Collaboration
- Keywords
- open source software, open-source models, collaborative software development, meritocracy, virtual communication, large-scale cooperation, organizational change, work practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
