Cited by 134Social Robot Interaction and HRITechnology Use by Older AdultsAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults

Open access

Ezer, Neta, Fisk, Arthur D., Rogers, Wendy A.·2009·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5PMC PMC4288776

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A study was conducted to examine the expectations that younger and older individuals have about domestic robots and how these expectations relate to robot acceptance. In a questionnaire participants were asked to imagine a robot in their home and to indicate how much items representing technology, social partner, and teammate acceptance matched their robot. There were additional questions about how useful and easy to use they thought their robot would be. The dependent variables were attitudinal and intentional acceptance. The analysis of the responses of 117 older adults (aged 65-86) and 60 younger adults (aged 18-25) indicated that individuals thought of robots foremost as performance-directed machines, less so as social devices, and least as unproductive entities. The robustness of the Technology Acceptance Model to robot acceptance was supported. Technology experience accounted for the variance in robot acceptance due to age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
Human-Computer Interaction
Carayannis, E. G. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_100431 · Cited by 4,819
User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts
Davis, F. D. (1993) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1022 · Cited by 4,754
Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs1
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422 · Cited by 2,472
Toward sociable robots
Breazeal, C. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00373-1 · Cited by 1,037
Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study
Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Aud, M. A., Marek, K. D., Tyrer, H. W., Skubic, M., & Hussam, A. A. (2004) · Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine · doi:10.1080/14639230410001684387 · Cited by 698
What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler?
Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M. L., Koay, K. L., & Werry, I. (2005) · 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2005.1545189 · Cited by 540
Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation
Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.403738 · Cited by 457

Show all 20 references

Sorted by citations

Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction
Beer, J. M., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · Journal of Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.5898/jhri.3.2.beer · Cited by 636
Self-citation
When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction
Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014 · Cited by 490
A Systematic Review of Attitudes, Anxiety, Acceptance, and Trust Towards Social Robots
Naneva, S., Gou, M. S., Webb, T. L., & Prescott, T. J. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00659-4 · Cited by 389
A review of technology acceptance by older adults
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2011) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00 · Cited by 353
Factors Predicting Decisions About Technology Adoption Among Older Adults
Berkowsky, R., Sharit, J., & Czaja, S. (2017) · Innovation in aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igy002 · Cited by 294
Population Ageing and Socially Assistive Robots for Elderly Persons: The Importance of Sociodemographic Factors for User Acceptance
Flandorfer, P. (2012) · International Journal of Population Research · doi:10.1155/2012/829835 · Cited by 257
Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential
Smarr, C.-A., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Why Would I Use This in My Home? A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance
de Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2017.1312406 · Cited by 272
Automated rationale generation: a technique for explainable AI and its effects on human perceptions
Ehsan, U., Tambwekar, P., Chan, L., Harrison, B., & Riedl, M. O. (2019) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3301275.3302316 · Cited by 210
Toward a Psychological Science of Advanced Technology Design for Older Adults
Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2010) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq065 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers
Fridin, M., & Belokopytov, M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.016 · Cited by 188
Review of the Factors Affecting Acceptance of AI-Infused Systems
Ismatullaev, U. V. U., & Kim, S. (2022) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211064707 · Cited by 198
Culturally variable preferences for robot design and use in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States
Lee, H. R., & Šabanović, S. (2014) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2559636.2559676 · Cited by 159
Robot acceptance model for care (RAM-care): A principled approach to the intention to use care robots
Turja, T., Aaltonen, I., Taipale, S., & Oksanen, A. (2020) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103220 · Cited by 142
Great Expectations? Relation of Previous Experiences With Social Robots in Real Life or in the Media and Expectancies Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment
Horstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00939 · Cited by 135
Older Adults’ Preferences for and Acceptance of Robot Assistance for Everyday Living Tasks
Smarr, C.-A., Prakash, A., Beer, J. M., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181312561009 · Cited by 126
Self-citation
Insights into Older Adults’ Technology Acceptance through Meta-Analysis
Ma, Q., Chan, A., & Teh, P. (2021) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1865005 · Cited by 113
The Effects of Perceived Identity Threat and Realistic Threat on the Negative Attitudes and Usage Intentions Toward Hotel Service Robots: The Moderating Effect of the Robot’s Anthropomorphism
Huang, H.-L., Cheng, L., Sun, P., & Chou, S.-J. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00752-2 · Cited by 118
Home robotic devices for older adults: opportunities and concerns
Deutsch, I., Erel, H., Paz, M., Hoffman, G., & Zuckerman, O. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.002 · Cited by 115
An autonomous robotic exercise tutor for elderly people
Görer, B., Salah, A. A., & Akın, H. L. (2016) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-016-9598-5 · Cited by 109
A Review on the Use of Mobile Service Robots in Elderly Care
Asgharian, P., Panchea, A. M., & Ferland, F. (2022) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics11060127 · Cited by 116
Robots for Elderly Care: Review, Multi-Criteria Optimization Model and Qualitative Case Study
Sawik, B., Tobis, S., Baum, E., Suwalska, A., Kropińska, S., Stachnik, K., Bernabeu, E. P., Cildoz, M., Agustín, A., & Wieczorowska–Tobis, K. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11091286 · Cited by 107
A Robot of My Own: Participatory Design of Socially Assistive Robots for Independently Living Older Adults Diagnosed with Depression
Šabanović, S., Chang, W.-L., Bennett, C. C., Piatt, J. A., & Hakken, D. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20892-3_11 · Cited by 100
Older adults’ experiences with and perceptions of the use of socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of quantitative evidence
Vandemeulebroucke, T., Dzi, K. T. J., & Gastmans, C. (2021) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104399 · Cited by 96
Understanding the potential of PARO for healthy older adults
McGlynn, S. A., Kemple, S., Mitzner, T. L., King, C.-H. A., & Rogers, W. A. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.12.004 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Social robots: The influence of human and robot characteristics on acceptance
Bishop, L. M., van Maris, A., Dogramadzi, S., & Zook, N. (2019) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2019-0028 · Cited by 94
Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise
Chen, T. L. B., Bhattacharjee, T., Beer, J. M., Ting, L. H., Hackney, M. E., Rogers, W. A., & Kemp, C. C. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182736 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
A Systematic Review of the Personality of Robot: Mapping Its Conceptualization, Operationalization, Contextualization and Effects
Mou, Y., Shi, C., Shen, T., & Xu, K. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1663008 · Cited by 82
Proposal for modeling social robot acceptance by retail customers: CAN model + technophobia
Navarro, A. S., Borondo, J. P., Lara, E. M. R., & Pascual, C. O. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102813 · Cited by 90
Older Adults Living With Social Robots: Promoting Social Connectedness in Long-Term Communities
Ostrowski, A. K., DiPaola, D., Partridge, E., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2019) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2019.2905234 · Cited by 78
Understanding Robot Acceptance
Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., & Rogers, W. A. (2011) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Dignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company
Coghlan, S., Waycott, J., Lazar, A., & Neves, B. B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449178 · Cited by 89
Age Difference in Perceived Ease of Use, Curiosity, and Implicit Negative Attitude toward Robots
Chien, S.-E., Chu, L., Lee, H.-H., Yang, C.-C., Lin, F.-H., Yang, P.-L., Wang, T., & Yeh, S. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3311788 · Cited by 87
Users' attitudes toward service robots in South Korea
Park, E., & del Pobil, A. P. (2013) · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application · doi:10.1108/01439911311294273 · Cited by 72
A phased framework for long-term user acceptance of interactive technology in domestic environments
de Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817727264 · Cited by 68
Attitudinal Change in Elderly Citizens Toward Social Robots: The Role of Personality Traits and Beliefs About Robot Functionality
Damholdt, M. F., Nørskov, M., Yamazaki, R., Hakli, R., Hansen, C. V., Vestergaard, C., & Seibt, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01701 · Cited by 67
Development of the Multi-dimensional Robot Attitude Scale: Constructs of People’s Attitudes Towards Domestic Robots
Ninomiya, T., Fujita, A., Suzuki, D., & Umemuro, H. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_48 · Cited by 62
Developing social robots for aging populations: A literature review of recent academic sources
Pedersen, I., Reid, S., & Aspevig, K. A. H. (2018) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12585 · Cited by 63
Assessment of Perceived Attractiveness, Usability, and Societal Impact of a Multimodal Robotic Assistant for Aging Patients With Memory Impairments
Gerłowska, J., Skrobas, U., Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz, K., Korchut, A., Szklener, S., Szczęśniak-Stańczyk, D., Tzovaras, D. K., & Rejdak, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00392 · Cited by 63
Safe, Flexible and Productive Human-Robot-Collaboration for Disassembly of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Gerbers, R., Wegener, K., Dietrich, F., & Dröder, K. (2017) · Sustainable production, life cycle engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70572-9_6 · Cited by 58
Companionship Is Not a Function: The Effect of a Novel Robotic Object on Healthy Older Adults' Feelings of "Being-Seen"
Zuckerman, O., Walker, D., Grishko, A., Moran, T., Levy, C., Lisak, B., Wald, I. Y., & Erel, H. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376411 · Cited by 61
Using socially assistive robots for monitoring and preventing frailty among older adults: A study on usability and user experience challenges
Olde Keizer, R. A. C. M., van Velsen, L., Moncharmont, M., Riche, B., Ammour, N., Del Signore, S., Zia, G., Hermens, H., & N’Dja, A. (2019) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-019-00320-9 · Cited by 57
Overcoming Barriers and Increasing Independence – Service Robots for Elderly and Disabled People
Hersh, M. A. (2015) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.5772/59230 · Cited by 55
Automated Rationale Generation: A Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human PerceptionsPreprint
Ehsan, U., Tambwekar, P., Chan, L., Harrison, B. E., & Riedl, M. O. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03729 · Cited by 52
Sustainable Adaptation of New Technology—The Case of Humanoids Used for the Care of Older Adults
Ejdys, J., & Halicka, K. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103770 · Cited by 21
When Stereotypes Meet Robots: The Effect of Gender Stereotypes on People’s Acceptance of a Security Robot
Tay, B. T. C., Park, T., Jung, Y., Tan, Y. K., & Wong, A. H. Y. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39360-0_29 · Cited by 50
A realistic, virtual head for human–computer interaction
Marcos-Pablos, S., Gómez‐García‐Bermejo, J., & Zalama, E. (2009) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2009.12.002 · Cited by 45
A Robot a Day Keeps the Blues Away
Bennett, C. C., Sabanovic, S., Piatt, J. A., Nagata, S., Eldridge, L., & Randall, N. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi.2017.43 · Cited by 43
Older People’s Prior Robot Attitudes Influence Evaluations of a Conversational Robot
Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., Li, X., & Broadbent, E. (2014) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0224-9 · Cited by 43
Robots and the Possibility of Humanistic Care
Coghlan, S. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00804-7 · Cited by 48
Expectations vs. actual behavior of a social robot: An experimental investigation of the effects of a social robot’s interaction skill level and its expected future role on people’s evaluations
Horstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238133 · Cited by 41
Attitudes towards care robots among Finnish home care personnel – a comparison of two approaches
Rantanen, T., Lehto, P., Vuorinen, P., & Coco, K. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12508 · Cited by 40
A Community-Centered Design Framework for Robot-Assisted Feeding Systems
Bhattacharjee, T., Cabrera, M. E., Caspi, A., Çakmak, M., & Srinivasa, S. S. (2019) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3308561.3353803 · Cited by 39
Robotics to support aging in place
Mois, G., & Beer, J. M. (2020) · Living with Robots · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815367-3.00003-7 · Cited by 36
Socially facilitative robots for older adults to alleviate social isolation: A participatory design workshop approach in the US and Japan
Fraune, M. R., Komatsu, T., Preusse, H. R., Langlois, D., Au, R. H. Y., Ling, K., Suda, S., Nakamura, K., & Tsui, K. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904019 · Cited by 39
Technology Acceptance in Socially Assistive Robots: Scoping Review of Models, Measurement, and Influencing Factors
He, Y., He, Q., & Liu, Q. (2022) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/6334732 · Cited by 35
In-home and remote use of robotic body surrogates by people with profound motor deficits
Grice, P. M., & Kemp, C. C. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212904 · Cited by 33
Towards a new scale for assessing attitudes towards social robots
Damholdt, M. F., Vestergaard, C., Nørskov, M., Hakli, R., Larsen, S., & Seibt, J. (2020) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.18055.fle · Cited by 30
Elderly’s acceptance of companion robots from the perspective of user factors
Huang, T., & Huang, C. (2019) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-019-00692-9 · Cited by 28
Technology Acceptance Models from Different Viewpoints of Caregiver, Receiver, and Care Facility Administrator: Lessons from Long-Term Implementation Using Baby-Like Interactive Robot for Nursing Home Residents with Dementia
Yamato, N., Sumioka, H., Ishiguro, H., Shiomi, M., & Kohda, Y. (2023) · Journal of technology in human services · doi:10.1080/15228835.2023.2292058 · Cited by 26
Personal Narratives in Technology Design: The Value of Sharing Older Adults’ Stories in the Design of Social Robots
Ostrowski, A. K., Harrington, C. N., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.716581 · Cited by 26
Advanced Assistive Technologies for Elderly People: A Psychological Perspective on Seniors’ Needs and Preferences (part A)
Troncone, A., Amorese, T., Cuciniello, M., Saturno, R., Pugliese, L., Cordasco, G., Vogel, C. M., & Esposito, A. A. (2020) · Acta Polytechnica Hungarica · doi:10.12700/aph.17.2.2020.2.10 · Cited by 28
“THIS ISN’T ME!”: The Role of Age-Related Self- and User Images for Robot Acceptance by Elders
Dudek, M., Baisch, S., Knopf, M., & Kolling, T. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00678-1 · Cited by 25
Robots in Eldercare: How Does a Real-World Interaction with the Machine Influence the Perceptions of Older People?
Tobis, S., Piasek-Skupna, J., Cylkowska-Nowak, M., & Suwalska, A. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22051717 · Cited by 25
Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with dementia
Deusdad, B. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436273 · Cited by 35
Understanding Older Adults’ Perceptions of Usefulness for the Paro Robot
McGlynn, S. A., Kemple, S., Mitzner, T. L., King, C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931214581400 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Factors that influence robot acceptance
Xu, L., & Yu, F. (2019) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2019-0136 · Cited by 21
Robotic Education in 21st Century: Teacher Acceptance of Lego Mindstorms as Powerful Educational Tools
Masril, M., Ambiyar, A., Jalinus, N., Ridwan, R., & Hendrik, B. (2021) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0120216 · Cited by 21
How Prefrail Older People Living Alone Perceive Information and Communications Technology and What They Would Ask a Robot for: Qualitative Study
Daniele, K., Marcucci, M., Cattaneo, C., Borghese, N. A., & Zannini, L. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/13228 · Cited by 18
L’interaction Homme-Robot, de l’anthropomorphisme à l’humanisation
Spatola, N. (2019) · L’Année psychologique · doi:10.3917/anpsy1.194.0515 · Cited by 24
I just wanna blame somebody, not something! Reactions to a computer agent giving negative feedback based on the instructions of a person
Horstmann, A. C., Gratch, J. S., & Krämer, N. C. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102683 · Cited by 18
Acceptance of virtual agents in a homecare context: Evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness in apneic patients during interventions by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) providers
Dupuy, L., Micoulaud‐Franchi, J., & Philip, P. (2020) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.13094 · Cited by 16
Robot-enhanced diabetes care for middle-aged and older adults living with diabetes in the community: A small sample size mixed-method evaluation
Chiu, C., Hua, L.-C., Chou, C.-Y., & Chiang, J.-H. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265384 · Cited by 12
Informal caregivers’ perception of assistive robots in eldercare
Tan, S., Yap, Y.-Y., Tan, S., & Wong, C. K. (2024) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100234 · Cited by 12
Technically in love: Individual differences relating to sexual and platonic relationships with robots
Leshner, C. E., & Johnson, J. (2024) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075241234377 · Cited by 12
Smart Living Technologies in the Context of Improving the Quality of Life For Older People: The Case of the Humanoid Rudy Robot
Halicka, K., & Surel, D. (2022) · Human Technology · doi:10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-2.5 · Cited by 11
The role of consumer robots in our everyday lives
Lum, H. C. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815367-3.00007-4 · Cited by 12
Impacts of a Care Robotics Project on Finnish Home Care Workers’ Attitudes towards Robots
Rantanen, T., Leppälahti, T., Porokuokka, J., & Heikkinen, S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197176 · Cited by 11
Preferences for technology versus human assistance and control over technology in the performance of kitchen and personal care tasks in baby boomers and older adults
Beach, S. R., Schulz, R., Matthews, J. T., Courtney, K. L., & Dabbs, A. D. (2013) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.832412 · Cited by 10
Final results of the NINFA project: impact of new technologies in the daily life of elderly people
Cinini, A., Cutugno, P., Ferraris, C., Ferretti, M., Marconi, L., Morgavi, G., & Nerino, R. (2019) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-019-01357-6 · Cited by 10
Social robot – Jack of all trades?
Kühne, K., Jeglinski-Mende, M. A., Fischer, M. H., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics · doi:10.1515/pjbr-2022-0002 · Cited by 9
Human, Organisational and Societal Factors in Robotic Rail Infrastructure Maintenance
Golightly, D., Chan-Pensley, J., Dadashi, N., Jundi, S., Ryan, B., & Hall, A. C. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14042123 · Cited by 9
Factors influencing the intention to use assistive technologies by older adults
Ejdys, J., & Gulc, A. (2022) · Human Technology · doi:10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-1.2 · Cited by 8
Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Technology by Older People: How the elderly in Brazil feel about using electronics
Raymundo, T. M., & Santana, C. D. S. (2014) · IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mce.2014.2340071 · Cited by 9
The introduction of care robots as a leadership challenge in home care facilities in Finland
Rantanen, T., Leppälahti, T., & Coco, K. (2021) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.933 · Cited by 8
Factors associated with intention to use care robots among people with physical disabilities
Jung, S. H., & Shin, Y. S. (2024) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102145 · Cited by 8
Challenges in Seniors Adopting Assistive Robots: A Systematic Review
Ariani, A., Kapadia, V., Talaei‐Khoei, A., Li, J., & RAY, P. K. (2016) · The International Technology Management Review · doi:10.2991/itmr.2016.6.2.1 · Cited by 9
Temporal Progression of Four Older Adults through Technology Acceptance Phases for a Mobile Telepresence Robot in Domestic Environments
Baggett, R., Šimeček, M., Tsui, K. M., & Fraune, M. R. (2024) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics13070095 · Cited by 7
Attitude Toward and Intention to Use Care Robot Technology in Older Adults and Family Members
Han, A., & Park, Y. (2019) · Korean Journal of Adult Nursing · doi:10.7475/kjan.2019.31.6.650 · Cited by 7
Victims and Observers: How Gender, Victimization Experience, and Biases Shape Perceptions of Robot Abuse
Goo, H. G., Winkle, K., Williams, T., & Strait, M. K. (2023) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man57019.2023.10309640 · Cited by 6
The domestication of robotic vacuum cleaners among seniors
Frennert, S., & Östlund, B. (2014) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2014.12.3.004.00 · Cited by 6
User acceptance of driverless vehicles and robots with aspect of personal economy
Kencebay, B. (2019) · Journal of Transnational Management · doi:10.1080/15475778.2019.1664234 · Cited by 6
Dimensions of people's attitudes toward robots
Suzuki, D., & Umemuro, H. (2012) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2157689.2157779 · Cited by 6
Individual Differences in Spatial Orientation Modulate Perspective Taking in Listeners
Loy, J. E., & Demberg, V. (2023) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.321 · Cited by 5
Understanding older adults’ initial perceptions of robot appearance and function: Implications for acceptance
Bayles, M. A., Lee, J., Kadylak, T., & Rogers, W. A. (2023) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2023.22.2.bay.08 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Designing Robots for Marketplace Success: A Case Study with Technology for Behavior and Habit Change
Randall, N., & Šabanović, S. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01093-y · Cited by 6
The Multifaceted Nature of Robotic Companionship when Presented as a Secondary Function
Erel, H., Dado, O., Manor, A., & Zuckerman, O. (2021) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451582 · Cited by 5
Exploring the Acceptance and Adoption of Humanoid Robots Among Older Adults: Systematic Review
Elsheikh, A., & Al‐Thani, D. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_25 · Cited by 5
Towards Pervasive Mobility Assessments in Clinical and Domestic Environments
Isken, M., Frenken, T., Frenken, M., & Hein, A. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16226-3_4 · Cited by 5
Design for Aging
O’Brien, M. A., & Rogers, W. A. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1966-1.ch006 · Cited by 5
Self-citation

Authors: Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A.
Affiliations: Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
ORCID: Rogers, Wendy A.
Venue: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published: 2009
Volume: 5615
Pages: 39-48
ISSN: 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
1611-3349
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5
PMC: PMC4288776
OpenAlex: W1698088155
Cited by: 134
References: 20
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI: 6.25
Type: conference paper
Language: en
Open access: green
europepmc.org
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders: National Institute on Aging (P01AG017211)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords: home robots, robot acceptance, technology acceptance, older adults, young adults, age differences, technology experience, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social robots, technology acceptance model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks