Cited by 457Innovation and Knowledge ManagementTechnology Assessment and ManagementCapital Investment and Risk Analysis

Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation

Green, S.G., Gavin, M.B., Aiman-Smith, L.·1995·IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Abstract

For almost 30 years, innovations have been characterized as radical or incremental. Nevertheless, the construct has not been precisely defined and ad hoc measures have been the norm in the literature. This paper describes the development of measures which address multiple dimensions of the concept of innovation radicalness and treat it as a continuous variable. A rigorous process of item development, reliability analysis, and both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used. The developed measures meet psychometric standards, demonstrate criterion-related validity, and capture four dimensions of radicalness: technological uncertainty, technical inexperience, business inexperience, and technology cost. Findings support the conceptualization of radicalness as a continuum with multiple dimensions, and suggest that those dimensions may be differentially related to project characteristics and outcomes. The utility of these measures and dimensions as diagnostic tools in project management is discussed. Radicalness as a multidimensional concept is also discussed as a valuable tool in project planning, project evaluation, and understanding the strategic implications of pursuing radical innovation.>

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/17.403738

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants recommended that the robot will incrementally introduce new features and be able to support and encourage older adults to use the technology as an installation method.

    “• Option 4: Robot will incrementally introduce new features and be able to support and encourage older adults to use the technology (Dewar and Dutton, 1986; Green et al., 1995; Ezer et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Published
1995
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
203-214
ISSN
0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039024661
Cited by
457
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Technology Assessment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Keywords
multidimensional measurement, technological uncertainty, technology costs, innovation project management, project planning, project evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review