Assessing a Multidimensional Measure of Radical Technological Innovation
Abstract
For almost 30 years, innovations have been characterized as radical or incremental. Nevertheless, the construct has not been precisely defined and ad hoc measures have been the norm in the literature. This paper describes the development of measures which address multiple dimensions of the concept of innovation radicalness and treat it as a continuous variable. A rigorous process of item development, reliability analysis, and both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used. The developed measures meet psychometric standards, demonstrate criterion-related validity, and capture four dimensions of radicalness: technological uncertainty, technical inexperience, business inexperience, and technology cost. Findings support the conceptualization of radicalness as a continuum with multiple dimensions, and suggest that those dimensions may be differentially related to project characteristics and outcomes. The utility of these measures and dimensions as diagnostic tools in project management is discussed. Radicalness as a multidimensional concept is also discussed as a valuable tool in project planning, project evaluation, and understanding the strategic implications of pursuing radical innovation.>
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participants recommended that the robot will incrementally introduce new features and be able to support and encourage older adults to use the technology as an installation method.
“• Option 4: Robot will incrementally introduce new features and be able to support and encourage older adults to use the technology (Dewar and Dutton, 1986; Green et al., 1995; Ezer et al., 2009).”
From Personal Narratives in Technology Design: The Value of Sharing Older Adults’ Stories in the Design of Social Robots (2021) · cites this paper as Green et al., 1995
Cites
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 · Cited by 3,470 · see citing works
Lee, Y., & Colarelli O'Connor, G. (2003) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.t01-1-201002 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Flandorfer, P. (2012) · International Journal of Population Research · doi:10.1155/2012/829835 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view
Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation
Spieth, P., & Schneider, S. (2016) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-015-0794-0 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults
Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Ostrowski, A. K., Harrington, C. N., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.716581 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“(cid:129) Option 4: Robot will incrementally introduce new features and be able to support and encourage older adults to use the technology (Dewar and Dutton, 1986; Green et al., 1995; Ezer et al., 2009).”
Background
- Authors
- Green, S. G., Gavin, M. B., & Aiman-Smith, L.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-214
- ISSN
- 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039024661
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Technology Assessment and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Keywords
- multidimensional measurement, technological uncertainty, technology costs, innovation project management, project planning, project evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review