When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human-robot interaction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most commercially available voice assistants (Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, etc.) are made exclusively available in female voices, or use female personas by default.
“However, most commercially available voice assistants (Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, etc.) are made exclusively available in female voices, or use female personas by default [76, 80].”
From Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2023) · cites this paper as [76]
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810 · see citing works
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664 · see citing works
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530 · see citing works
Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811417254 · Cited by 2,051 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A plausible explanation for this non-significant result is that trust between a human and a robot could be deeply rooted in cognitive functions, such as the performances of the robot (Hancock et al., 2011).”
BackgroundNass, C., & Lee, K. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.7.3.171 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Baker, R. K., & White, K. M. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.006 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions?
Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, C. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.178 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Looije, R., Neerincx, M. A., & Cnossen, F. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.007 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults
Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brave new world: service robots in the frontline
Wirtz, J., Patterson, P. G., Kunz, W. H., Gruber, T., Lu, V. N., Paluch, S., & Martins, A. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2018-0119 · Cited by 2,315 · see citing works
Mariani, M. M., Perez‐Vega, R., & Wirtz, J. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21619 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices
Li, B., Qi, P., Liu, B., Di, S., Liu, J., Pei, J., Yi, J., & Zhou, B. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3555803 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Voice in Human–Agent Interaction: A Survey
Seaborn, K., Miyake, N. P., Pennefather, P., & Otake-Matsuura, M. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3386867 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Hong, J.-W., Wang, Y., & Lanz, P. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1785693 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Algorithmic Transference: People Overgeneralize Failures of AI in the Government
Longoni, C., Cian, L., & Kyung, E. J. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437221110139 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Chugunova, M., & Sele, D. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101897 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Human–robot similarity and willingness to work with a robotic co-worker
You, S., & Robert Jr., L. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171281 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Ffab—the form function attribution bias in human-robot interaction
Haring, K. S., Watanabe, K., Velonaki, M., Tossell, C. C., & Finomore, V. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2018.2851569 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
McGinn, C., Bourke, E., Murtagh, A., Donovan, C., Lynch, P., Cullinan, M. F., & Kelly, K. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-019-01051-9 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Can robots elicit empathy? The effects of social robots’ appearance on emotional contagion
Yang, W., & Xie, Y. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100049 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Zhong, R., & Ma, M. (2022) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03428-2 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“According to [51], people more easily accept robots that are in line with their stereotypes regarding such devices.”
BackgroundEnactive artificial intelligence: subverting gender norms in human-robot interaction
Hipólito, I., Winkle, K., & Lie, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2023.1149303 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Soongsil University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Taezoon
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 38
- Pages
- 75-84
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035833057
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 17.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- social robots, human-robot interaction, robot personality, stereotypes, job roles, user acceptance, healthcare robots, security robots, extraversion-introversion, nonverbal cues, home robots, robot design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review