Cited by 34Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Accessing Google Docs via Screen Reader

Buzzi, Maria Claudia, Buzzi, Marina, Leporini, Barbara, Mori, Giulio, Penichet, Victor M. R.·2010·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-14097-6_17

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buzzi, M. C., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B., Mori, G., & Penichet, V. M. R.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IT)
  • Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" (IT)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2010
Pages
92-99
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2102050550
Cited by
34
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • ISTI Open Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
Google Docs, screen readers, voice synthesizer, accessibility, usability, groupware, remote collaboration, assistive technology, user interface design guidelines, people with disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review