Cited by 81Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Tension, what tension?: Website accessibility and visual design

Petrie, Helen, Hamilton, Fraser, King, Neil·2004·Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility - W4A

Abstract

There appears to be a widespread belief within the web design community -- and possibly amongst website commissioners - that accessible sites cannot be visually pleasing. We present the results of accessibility testing of 100 websites with 51 disabled users that should dispel this belief. While there are aspects of accessibility that do affect visual design, such as visual structure, colour contrast and text size, these are aspects of design that can affect all users, not only disabled users. These design concerns must be considered if both the users' experience and business objectives are to be met.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/990657.990660

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even Web sites that meet current accessibility requirements still create barriers for blind users.

    “Web sites that comply with existing accessibility requirements still present access barriers for the blind (Correani et al. 2004;Petrie et al., 2004).”

    From Understanding Blind Users' Web Accessibility and Usability Problems (2010) · cites this paper as Petrie et al., 2004

  • Restrictions on contrast and the use of colour are perceived as compromising the visual design.

    “Often named fears refer to the restrictions on contrast and the use of colour, which are perceived as compromising the visual design (Mbipom and Harper, 2011; Petrie et al., 2004).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., & King, N.
Affiliations
City, University of London (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility - W4A
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2004
Pages
13
OpenAlex
W2002873388
Cited by
80
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Web for All Conference (W4A) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
web accessibility, visual design, accessible websites, color contrast, font size, visual structure, disabled users, user experience, web design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review