Cited by 1,4803D Shape Modeling and AnalysisAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Unique Signatures of Histograms for Local Surface Description

Tombari, Federico, Salti, Samuele, Di Stefano, Luigi·2010·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-15558-1_26

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tombari, F., Salti, S., & Di Stefano, L.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2010
Pages
356-369
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2160643963
Cited by
1,480
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 127 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 156 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 35
FWCI
63.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
surface matching, surface representation, local reference frame, repeatability, histograms, signature, range scans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review