Cited by 50Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesTactile and Sensory Interactions

BlindShopping: Enabling Accessible Shopping for Visually Impaired People through Mobile Technologies

López-de-Ipiña, Diego, Lorido, Tania, López, Unai·2011·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-21535-3_39

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 3 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
López-de-Ipiña, D., Lorido, T., & López, U.
Affiliations
Universidad de Deusto (ES)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2011
Pages
266-270
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W121672862
Cited by
50
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
visually impaired people, assistive technology, mobile navigation, white cane, RFID, QR codes, product recognition, supermarket navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review