Cited by 81Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Trinetra: Assistive Technologies for Grocery Shopping for the Blind

Lanigan, Patrick, Paulos, Aaron, Williams, Andrew, Rossi, Dan, Narasimhan, Priya·2006·2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers

Abstract

Trinetra aims for cost-effective, assistive technologies to provide an independent grocery-shopping experience for the blind by leveraging barcodes and networking diverse embedded COTS devices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iswc.2006.286369

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lanigan, P., Paulos, A., Williams, A., Rossi, D., & Narasimhan, P.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006-10
Pages
147-148
ISSN
1550-4816 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985138727
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
assistive technology, grocery shopping, blind people, visual impairment, barcode scanning, embedded devices, low-cost equipment, independent living, assistive robotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review